UAH is secular, intellectual and non-aligned politically, culturally or religiously email discussion group.


{UAH} Abuse victim who was handed £175,000 compensation is ordered to give his ex-wife £100,000 of it as part of his divorce settlement

Gwokto,

What do you make of this judgement? By the way, courts here are beginning to go the American way, of ordering ridiculous divorce settlements at such an alarming rate, I cant see how long the institution of marriage will last Ex-wives are coming back, some even after 20 years, to get improved settelemts or to challenge earlier ones.. The biggest error the legal system has done now is to recognise marriage as a purely commercial arrangement or even investment.


Abuse victim who was handed £175,000 compensation is ordered to give his ex-wife £100,000 of it as part of his divorce settlement

  • Andrew Kerslake was given £175,000 compensation for suffering sexual abuse
  • But his ex-wife demanded a share of the fund, saying it was a marital asset 
  • Mr Kerslake now has to pay her a lump sum of £100,000, or risk going to jail 
  • His ex-wife claims she needs the money to support herself and her two children

Andrew Kerslake regards the settlement as 'dirty money' and has put it in a trust

Andrew Kerslake regards the settlement as 'dirty money' and has put it in a trust

A judge has ordered a father to give his estranged wife £100,000 from the compensation he received for suffering sexual abuse as a child.

Andrew Kerslake, 47, was given £175,000 by the Government but regarded the cash as 'dirty money' and put it into a trust, to be given to a charity when he dies.

But as part of her divorce settlement, his ex-wife Helen Tippett, 42, applied to a court in Wales to demand a share of the fund, claiming it was a marital asset.

After a hearing held in private, Judge Stuart Batcup ruled in Mrs Tippett's favour. Mr Kerslake was given until tomorrow to pay a lump sum of £100,000, or risk going to jail for contempt of court.

The case can be reported after a legal battle by the Daily Mail, which was banned from the hearing despite new rules allowing accredited journalists into all levels of family courts.

Mr Kerslake said yesterday: 'I will fight it all the way and go to jail if necessary. Helen ... and her new man will spend it how they like. It's shameful that she has even asked for the money, how can she get pleasure out of my pain and suffering?

'It doesn't seem right – she wasn't the one who was abused. I will do everything I can to defend the trust for the future.'

He added: 'The money was paid to me for what happened long before I met my wife. There is a principle here. I can't understand how the courts can award my compensation to my ex-wife. It doesn't make sense.'

Mr Kerslake was molested between the ages of five and ten by a family friend.

After he finally went to the police in 1998, his abuser was jailed for three years.

In 2002, he was given the £175,000 by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, which pays damages to victims of violent crime. He set up the Andrew Kerslake Trust to be used to help other victims of predatory paedophiles.

Mrs Tippett has argued that she needs the money to buy a property for herself and her two youngest children - despite now living with her new partner

Mrs Tippett has argued that she needs the money to buy a property for herself and her two youngest children - despite now living with her new partner

By the time of the hearing the fund had grown to £200,000 and the judge ordered the money be split equally between the pair. Mr Kerslake, who has waived his right to anonymity as a sex abuse victim, was too ill to attend the hearing at the Family Court in Pontypridd, South Wales, on May 25.

Mrs Tippett attended and argued she needed the money to buy a property for herself and her two youngest children, even though she is living with new partner Jarrod Williams.

Mr Kerslake said: 'My wife wanted to spend the lot, she wanted a beautiful house, she had all sorts of ways of spending it. But to me it is dirty money. I was abused over 500 times, every Monday, Wednesday, Friday and Saturday, and nothing could compensate me for that.'

Mrs Tippett and Mr Kerslake were happily married when the compensation was granted.

The hearing was held at the Family Court in Pontypridd, South Wales (pictured)

The hearing was held at the Family Court in Pontypridd, South Wales (pictured) 

Mrs Tippett was studying for a humanities degree at university and Mr Kerslake, who walks with crutches after hurting his back in a fall, was raising their four children.

Their 19-year marriage ended six years ago and Mr Kerslake has become estranged from his children, aged between seven and 22. He lives alone in a housing association bungalow in Llanharan, a village near Bridgend in south Wales, while Mrs Tippett works part-time in a church breakfast club.

The judge barred the press from the court, claiming the publicity was not in the interests of the couple's children, who could read reports of the proceedings on the internet.

Mr Kerslake has been given leave to appeal the result and a hearing will be held later this year.

Mrs Tippett refused to comment on the case.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4701776/Man-handed-175-000-ordered-ex-wife-100-000.html#ixzz4n72GY6gx 
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

--
Disclaimer:Everyone posting to this Forum bears the sole responsibility for any legal consequences of his or her postings, and hence statements and facts must be presented responsibly. Your continued membership signifies that you agree to this disclaimer and pledge to abide by our Rules and Guidelines.To unsubscribe from this group, send email to: ugandans-at-heart+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

Sharing is Caring:


WE LOVE COMMENTS


0 comments:

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

Followers