UAH is secular, intellectual and non-aligned politically, culturally or religiously email discussion group.


{UAH} JOHN RUKUMBURA YOU HAVE GOT MAIL

New York Times Op-Ed Contributor
How Rwanda Threatens Its Future


Photo: Displaced people approaching the border between the Democratic
Republic of Congo and Rwanda in 2012. James Akena / Reuters

​August 16, 2013

Collective guilt over the genocide in 1994 has shaped the world's
relations with Rwanda ever since. Without question, the systematic
killing of 800,000 people is one of the foremost historic blights of
the last century. And the international community deserves blame for
ignoring facts and avoiding action when intervention could have saved
thousands.

But it's time to take off the kid gloves when dealing with this tiny,
landlocked country with outsized influence in East Africa. If there's
any hope of Rwanda winning truly lasting stability, it must change
course and stop fueling conflicts across its borders.

The progress Rwanda has made since the genocide is nothing less than
remarkable. Any visitor to Kigali today will immediately note the
clean new streets. The capital is filled with new malls catering to
the wealthy, restaurants offering panoramic views of the city and
cafés brewing Rwanda's own world-renowned coffee.

Over the last decade, Rwanda's economy has averaged above 8 percent
growth per year, according to the I.M.F., and it is considered the
best place in Africa to start a business, according to the World
Bank's latest rankings. Millions have been pulled out of poverty,
people live more than 20 years longer than they did in the 1990s,
maternal and child mortality rates have dropped dramatically, and
health care coverage is nearly universal. When I was working with the
U.S. Agency for International Development on health and economic
projects in Rwanda, I couldn't help but be impressed by how quickly
the country was developing.

All of this has made Rwanda a darling of aid donors, and Rwandan
leaders are deft at handling them. Officials feel at home at
international summit meetings and President Paul Kagame — one of the
most popular African leaders on Twitter — exudes confidence on the
global stage.

This combination of international sympathy, impressive economic growth
and political savvy has caused the United States, Britain and other
powers to largely turn a blind eye to Kigali's transgressions.

Simmering under the surface and threatening to explode after Kagame's
departure are ethnic and political tensions that now go mostly
unaddressed. The hostility between Tutsis and Hutus is far from ended,
and the governing system is entrenching one-man rule instead of
building effective checks and balances. Progress is stunted by a lack
of freedom, a repressive media environment, little protection for
human rights and the sidelining of political opponents.

Nowhere is the need for international pressure on Rwanda to change its
ways more evident than in Kigali's stance toward its neighbor, the
Democratic Republic of Congo. Many of the Hutu perpetrators of the
1994 genocide fled to eastern Congo after a Tutsi-led opposition army
seized control of Rwanda. Looking to prevent any future threat to
their rule, Kigali's leaders have been active in the Congo ever since.
While Rwandan interference is largely due to a longstanding ethnic
rivalry and the desire to create a protective buffer along the border,
control of the region's mineral wealth is another key factor.

In April 2012, a rebel group with ties to Kigali launched a campaign
to liberate Congo. The group, known as M23, briefly held the city of
Goma next to the border with Rwanda. Despite an international peace
agreement in February, fighting flared again in May and July. Since
the violence began, some 800,000 people have been displaced.

Rwanda's meddling has been known for years, but public criticism is
mounting. Last year, the United Nations accused Kigali of actively
supporting M23, and last month Human Rights Watch warned that despite
Kigali's repeated denials the Rwandan military continues to support
the rebels.

The crossing between Rwanda and Goma, the heart of the violence, is
one of the starkest borders I've ever seen. Rwanda's side has a
man-made beach, a five-star hotel and beautifully paved roads;
immediately across the border a potholed road leads to a land where
the feeling of insecurity is palpable.

Rwanda cannot be blamed for all of Congo's problems. This region has
endured the world's most deadly conflict since World War II, a war
that left the country in ruins, its economic troubles and ethnic
tensions compounded by inept and corrupt governance.

But Rwanda has come far enough to start acting differently toward
Congo; it should work to ease that country's problems rather than fuel
them.

The United States, Britain and the rest of Rwanda's supporters need to
use their leverage — foreign funds make up around 40 percent of
Kigali's budget — to demand better behavior. They should forcefully
and publicly condemn Kigali for its links to militant groups in Congo
and its undemocratic tendencies at home. Although some countries froze
assistance last year after allegations about Rwanda's activity in
Congo surfaced, more needs to be done.

Rwanda's leaders recognize how critical it is to maintain
international good will. They need to know that they risk losing more
financial support. Further sanctions should be put on the table, along
with additional incentives to reward good behavior.

The obvious concern, if Kigali doesn't respond properly, is for the
Rwandan people. The progress in health and economic well-being could
be lost if the region spirals downward. The best way to exorcise the
demons of Rwanda's past is to minimize the risk of future turmoil.
"Never again" must be the priority.

The Rwandan government deserves credit for making swift economic and
political progress in the years since the 1994 genocide — progress
that no one thought possible. But now Rwanda needs to become a more
responsible regional actor, and deal forthrightly with the issues that
threaten its future. The international community must put pressure on
Kigali to do so.

David Kampf is director of communications at the Carnegie Endowment
for International Peace. He worked on development projects in Rwanda
from 2006 to 2008.

 

           Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni and Dr. Kiiza Besigye Uganda is in anarchy"
           
Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni na Dk. Kiiza Besigye Uganda ni katika machafuko"

Sharing is Caring:


WE LOVE COMMENTS


0 comments:

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

Followers