Re: {UAH} If History Is A Guide, Uganda Can't Escape A People’s Revolution

Ed:  Thank you for your honesty.  The problem is that we have been discussing so many things that we have gotten mixed up. History impacts the present and the present impacts the future. The history of Uganda is that we have so many people from from different ancestral backgrounds that are now living together in a country called Uganda.  So we should accept that historical fact and find a way of living together. But some people are saying that they are different from others and that they are nations like Buganda, Ankole, Kigezi. They are therefore saying that those who don't belong with them should leave their geographical area as few but vocal Baganda have been saying on radio Munansi. This has now brought in the issue of a nation which to me means a common ancestry and a common ancestral language.  If you go by this yard stick you are not going to find a location in Uganda that is settled by people settled by one common ancestry.  As globalization proceeds including migrations within our region we must accept the concept of a multi nation state and try to live together.  Within the geographical demarcations as Buganda, western region, northern regional, eastern region, we should allow federalism and confederalism so that different communities can decide how they want to develop instead of trying to call for secession or self determination on the basis of one common ancestry.  For example in Buganda, it is very difficult to decide who is a pure Muganda, an assimilated Muganda or a non-Muganda living, in Buganda. That is why I have been arguing for keeping Buganda as is as Nigeria has decided and organize a nationsal convention to decide how Ugandans want to be governed within a country called Uganda.

On Sunday, November 9, 2014 9:49:26 PM UTC-5, Dr.Edward Kayondo wrote:

Prof.Eric,

That's why I never liked history and couldn't get past the Portuguese invasion stories, history never takes note of the current times. I dont know why but it never considers the technological evolutions, globalization, new discoveries, generation changes, it just stays in the past, history is very boring.

Anyways, I am not sure if the state is stealing land or those who own it especially in the Central region are selling it as they wish.

By the way if I may ask, the people in these revolutions you mentioned what was their tribal affiliations or they never had such basic divisions prior to their land struggles? And what role did religion play in these revolutions if any? We both know you need real unity to pull of something that big.

I only ask because I never study history that far because the present is so interesting and occupying and I have a beleif that what happens now determines what happens tomorrow so I tend to spend my precious time in the moment.

Educate me professor.

Eddie, M.D

---

From: Eric Kashambuzi <kashamb...@gmail.com>
To: UAH <ugandans...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 9, 2014 8:56 PM
Subject: Re: {UAH} If History Is A Guide, Uganda Can't Escape A People's Revolution

Because of time constraints I will not be able to post on the Forum as regularly as before. I urge my followers to join me on my face book page which is providing a rich and diverse information.

On Nov 6, 2014 7:38 PM, "Eric Kashambuzi" <kashamb...@gmail.com> wrote:

If History Is A Guide, Uganda Can't Escape A People's Revolution

Eric KashambuziNovember 06,2014

Like Nicolae Ceaușescu is dictator Museveni out of touch?

By and large, revolutions in time and space exhibit common characteristics. They have long-term and immediate causes. But sudden and unanticipated changes as in Tunisia in December 2010 trigger the revolutions.

In almost all countries including France, Russia, Mexico, Ethiopia and Tunisia where revolutions have occurred land ownership was skewed in favor of a few people or institutions at the expense of the majority.

Due to space constraints I will focus on France.

At the start of the French Revolution in 1789 land ownership was unequally distributed. The first estate consisting of the clergy numbering some 130,000, the church owned 10 percent of the land and was exempt from paying taxes although it made a voluntary contribution to the state every five years.

The second estate made up of the nobility numbering about 350,000 owned between 25 and 30 percent of the land. The nobility was also exempt from paying taxes.

The third estate was made up of commoners of whom 80 percent were peasants who owned about 40 percent of the land (Jackson J. Spielvogel 1999). The balance of the land went to the middle class also like peasants classified as commoners. The third estate that paid the bulk of taxes was largely excluded from public offices.

What we are witnessing in Uganda is that land is increasingly being concentrated in fewer hands including by foreigners using various means such as the notion of "willing seller and willing buyer" disguised to dispossess powerless and voiceless peasants.

Consequently, Uganda is experiencing rapid landlessness and rural-urban migration and sprawling urban slums with all the attendant challenges.

The second characteristic in countries where revolutions have occurred is economic inequality. It has been shown that 50 years before the revolution, France had experienced rapid economic growth due to accelerated industrial production and international trade. However, the majority of French people did not share in the benefits of that growth.

In Uganda it has been shown that when her economy grew fastest in the mid-1990s, the majority of Ugandans did not benefit and continued to languish in absolute poverty. Former administrator of UNDP James G. Speth observed "Uganda is a leading example of an African country that is doing many of the right economic things to lift people out of poverty. It has posted growth rates averaging over 6% a year for a decade. Yet two-thirds of the population remain in absolute poverty, and per capita income is only now approaching the level it had attained in 1970"(Development Cooperation Seminar Tokyo, 1999).  

Inequalities in income distribution, fluctuations in economic activities and rapid population growth are also reflected in unemployment, under-employment and low wages relative to inflation that contribute to revolutions.

Shortly before the French revolution, unemployment rose to dangerous levels where one-third (33%) of adult workers had no jobs in part because France could not compete with English manufactured products. Furthermore, during the 18th century, wages in France rose by 22 percent against a price hike of about 45 percent (Steven Hause & William Maltby 1999; John W. Hall, 2002).

Under-employment, unemployment and low wages have been magnified under the National Resistance Movement (NRM) government in Uganda.

It is estimated that over 80 percent of Uganda youth including university graduates are unemployed. In many cases Uganda wages are below subsistence level, thanks in part to the policy of labor flexibility that allows employers to set the wages, hire and fire at will. Consequently, many workers especially domestic servants are exploited.

The third characteristic that precedes the revolution is that various groups albeit with different backgrounds and interests come together to express their dissatisfaction.

In France four groups converged: the aristocratic group was opposed to tax reform; the middle class (bourgeois) challenged aristocratic control of public offices; peasants opposed the remnants of feudalism; and an urban working class wanted economic and political reforms (Steven Hause and William Maltby 1999).

In Ethiopia, political, economic and social dissatisfaction with the imperial regime brought together taxi drivers, teachers, students, street vendors and labor unions (D. Fogel, 1982).

Ugandans at home and in the Diaspora are being called upon to come together and collectively challenge the NRM regime that has failed to deliver in virtually all areas of human endeavor as desired by the people.

Above all, these grievances are sparked into a revolution by a sudden and unanticipated event. In Tunisia it was Mohamad Bouazizi who set himself on fire in protest against oppression and injustice and died a few days later.

In Ethiopia it was the rejection by the Emperor and the prime minister of the demands presented by the workers union that sparked the strikes demanding the resignation of the prime minister and calling for a people's government (D. Fogel, 1982).

In France the revolution was sparked when Louis XVI summoned 20,000 soldiers to the meeting of the Estates-General at Versailles that the disgruntled crowds of Paris reacted to (John W. Hall 2002).

Thus, in Uganda the conditions for a revolution exist in abundance.

Ugandans are waiting for a spark to set it off. However, Museveni and his NRM advisers can stop it only if they act quickly to meet the political, economic and social demands.

 

Eric Kashambuzi is New York-based consultant on development issues.

- See more at: http://www.blackstarnews.com/global-politics/africa/if-history-is-a-guide-uganda-cant-escape-a-people%E2%80%99s-revolution#sthash.nzf1BKc7.dpuf

You are here

Home › Global Politics › Africa ›

If History Is A Guide, Uganda Can't Escape A People's Revolution

Eric KashambuziNovember 06,2014

^-A ⁺A

0

Like Nicolae Ceaușescu is dictator Museveni out of touch?

By and large, revolutions in time and space exhibit common characteristics. They have long-term and immediate causes. But sudden and unanticipated changes as in Tunisia in December 2010 trigger the revolutions.

In almost all countries including France, Russia, Mexico, Ethiopia and Tunisia where revolutions have occurred land ownership was skewed in favor of a few people or institutions at the expense of the majority.

Due to space constraints I will focus on France.

At the start of the French Revolution in 1789 land ownership was unequally distributed. The first estate consisting of the clergy numbering some 130,000, the church owned 10 percent of the land and was exempt from paying taxes although it made a voluntary contribution to the state every five years.

The second estate made up of the nobility numbering about 350,000 owned between 25 and 30 percent of the land. The nobility was also exempt from paying taxes.

The third estate was made up of commoners of whom 80 percent were peasants who owned about 40 percent of the land (Jackson J. Spielvogel 1999). The balance of the land went to the middle class also like peasants classified as commoners. The third estate that paid the bulk of taxes was largely excluded from public offices.

What we are witnessing in Uganda is that land is increasingly being concentrated in fewer hands including by foreigners using various means such as the notion of "willing seller and willing buyer" disguised to dispossess powerless and voiceless peasants.

Consequently, Uganda is experiencing rapid landlessness and rural-urban migration and sprawling urban slums with all the attendant challenges.

The second characteristic in countries where revolutions have occurred is economic inequality. It has been shown that 50 years before the revolution, France had experienced rapid economic growth due to accelerated industrial production and international trade. However, the majority of French people did not share in the benefits of that growth.

In Uganda it has been shown that when her economy grew fastest in the mid-1990s, the majority of Ugandans did not benefit and continued to languish in absolute poverty. Former administrator of UNDP James G. Speth observed "Uganda is a leading example of an African country that is doing many of the right economic things to lift people out of poverty. It has posted growth rates averaging over 6% a year for a decade. Yet two-thirds of the population remain in absolute poverty, and per capita income is only now approaching the level it had attained in 1970"(Development Cooperation Seminar Tokyo, 1999).  

Inequalities in income distribution, fluctuations in economic activities and rapid population growth are also reflected in unemployment, under-employment and low wages relative to inflation that contribute to revolutions.

Shortly before the French revolution, unemployment rose to dangerous levels where one-third (33%) of adult workers had no jobs in part because France could not compete with English manufactured products. Furthermore, during the 18th century, wages in France rose by 22 percent against a price hike of about 45 percent (Steven Hause & William Maltby 1999; John W. Hall, 2002).

Under-employment, unemployment and low wages have been magnified under the National Resistance Movement (NRM) government in Uganda.

It is estimated that over 80 percent of Uganda youth including university graduates are unemployed. In many cases Uganda wages are below subsistence level, thanks in part to the policy of labor flexibility that allows employers to set the wages, hire and fire at will. Consequently, many workers especially domestic servants are exploited.

The third characteristic that precedes the revolution is that various groups albeit with different backgrounds and interests come together to express their dissatisfaction.

In France four groups converged: the aristocratic group was opposed to tax reform; the middle class (bourgeois) challenged aristocratic control of public offices; peasants opposed the remnants of feudalism; and an urban working class wanted economic and political reforms (Steven Hause and William Maltby 1999).

In Ethiopia, political, economic and social dissatisfaction with the imperial regime brought together taxi drivers, teachers, students, street vendors and labor unions (D. Fogel, 1982).

Ugandans at home and in the Diaspora are being called upon to come together and collectively challenge the NRM regime that has failed to deliver in virtually all areas of human endeavor as desired by the people.

Above all, these grievances are sparked into a revolution by a sudden and unanticipated event. In Tunisia it was Mohamad Bouazizi who set himself on fire in protest against oppression and injustice and died a few days later.

In Ethiopia it was the rejection by the Emperor and the prime minister of the demands presented by the workers union that sparked the strikes demanding the resignation of the prime minister and calling for a people's government (D. Fogel, 1982).

In France the revolution was sparked when Louis XVI summoned 20,000 soldiers to the meeting of the Estates-General at Versailles that the disgruntled crowds of Paris reacted to (John W. Hall 2002).

Thus, in Uganda the conditions for a revolution exist in abundance.

Ugandans are waiting for a spark to set it off. However, Museveni and his NRM advisers can stop it only if they act quickly to meet the political, economic and social demands.

 

Eric Kashambuzi is New York-based consultant on development issues.

- See more at: http://www.blackstarnews.com/global-politics/africa/if-history-is-a-guide-uganda-cant-escape-a-people%E2%80%99s-revolution#sthash.nzf1BKc7.dpuf

--
UAH forum is devoted to matters of interest to Ugandans. Individuals are responsible for whatever they post on this forum.To unsubscribe from this group, send email to: ugandans-at-he...@googlegroups.com or Abbey Semuwemba at: abbeyse...@gmail.com.

--
UAH forum is devoted to matters of interest to Ugandans. Individuals are responsible for whatever they post on this forum.To unsubscribe from this group, send email to: ugandans-at-he...@googlegroups.com or Abbey Semuwemba at: abbeyse...@gmail.com.

--
UAH forum is devoted to matters of interest to Ugandans. Individuals are responsible for whatever they post on this forum.To unsubscribe from this group, send email to: ugandans-at-heart+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com or Abbey Semuwemba at: abbeysemuwemba@gmail.com.