{UAH} Data Scientists Encourage Hillary Clinton To Challenge Election Results

Data Scientists Encourage Hillary Clinton To Challenge Election Results

A group of computer scientists and election lawyers are urging Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton to demand a manual recount of ballots, saying they noticed some statistical irregularities in key swing states.
J. Alex Halderman, a computer scientist, noted that U.S. voting machines have "have serious cybersecurity problems" that open them up to hacking. He emphasized that there's currently no evidence that machines in key swing states that went to Trump were hacked, but that it's necessary to examine physical evidence to make sure they were not:

"I believe the most likely explanation is that the polls were systematically wrong, rather than that the election was hacked. But I don't believe that either one of these seemingly unlikely explanations is overwhelmingly more likely than the other. The only way to know whether a cyberattack changed the result is to closely examine the available physical evidence — paper ballots and voting equipment in critical states like Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. Unfortunately, nobody is ever going to examine that evidence unless candidates in those states act now, in the next several days, to petition for recounts."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-challenge-election-results_us_5834e3a6e4b000af95ed3a34


Hillary Clinton's lead over Donald Trump in the popular vote surpassed 2 million Wednesday morning, according to Dave Wasserman of the nonpartisan Cook Political Report.
Clinton has garnered 64,223,958 votes, compared to Trump's 62,206,395 votes.

By Nov. 15, the Democratic nominee's advantage had crossed the 1-million mark and ballooned to 1.5 million by Sunday.
Despite Clinton's lead in the popular vote, it was Trump who prevailed on Election Day by clinching 270 Electoral College votes.
Trump told New York Times reporters Tuesday he would "rather do the popular vote" and was "never a fan of the Electoral College until now."
"The popular vote would have been a lot easier, but it's a whole different campaign. I would have been in California, I would have been in Texas, Florida and New York, and we wouldn't have gone anywhere else," Trump said. "Which is, I mean I'd rather do the popular vote."
"But I think the popular vote would have been easier in a true sense because you'd go to a few places," he added. "I think that's the genius of the Electoral College. I was never a fan of the Electoral College until now."
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/clinton-lead-popular-vote-2016-231790



The way I see it, it is absurd but not surprising that USA has two types of electing, the popular vote and the Electoral College. So which is which? In this day and age it is technology rigging and a stroke of a pen. Is there much difference to the African and Asian dictators? Perhaps it is only method. So many reports of voter fraud, voter intimidation, voter confusing, voter name dropping and more. However, the dictators across the seas use more visible guns, more visible army in uniform with automatic rifles and even military tanks. Buying of voters with Govt. money and so much more!

So these dictators are laughing so much over the joke of USA democracy, voting, and elections!!!


Let alone......

How Christian America Elected The President No Other Religion Could Get Behind

And Catholic America even more so White or Caucasian America

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/how-christian-america-elected-the-president-no-other-religion-could-get-behind_us_58238d4be4b0d9ce6fc09b8a


But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.

Daniel 12:4

  Jessica Nakawombe

"Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous.

Do not be afraid; do not be discouraged, for the LORD your God will be with you wherever you go." (Joshua 1:9)