|
|
Editor's note |
---|
The International Criminal Court came under the spotlight several times this year. In this special newsletter we look at some of the big events. Kerstin Carlson unpacks why the conviction of Congolese warlord Bosco Ntaganda, found guilty of war crimes, torture, and sexual slavery, marked a significant victory for the ICC. But, as she explained, the decision to acquit former Ivorian leader Laurent Gbagbo showed there was a need to look at how international criminal law fails its promise to hold leaders accountable. She also looked at the court's ongoing battle to bring Sudan's deposed president Omar al-Bashir to book, also the subject of analysis from Mattia Cacciatori. The court is meant to be a court of last resort which ensures justice for victims and ends impunity. But it's not living up to these promises, argued Luke Moffett. In a different twist, Marco Bocchese explained how African leaders seeking the involvement of the court have done so for far from altruistic reasons. And Yvonne McDermott argued that acquittals should be seen as a vindication of the ICC as an independent and impartial judicial institution. | Julius Maina Regional Editor East Africa |  |
| Turbulent year for the ICC |
---|
 Congolese Bosco Ntaganda in the courtroom during the closing statements of his trial in The Hague. EPA-EFE/Bas Czerwinski Kerstin Carlson, University of Southern Denmark Ntaganda's conviction represents real progress, and an actual significant victory, for the ICC. | |
---|
 Kerstin Carlson, University of Southern Denmark Acquittal bolsters an increasingly urgent conversation about how international criminal law is failing in its promise to hold leaders accountable | |  Kerstin Carlson, University of Southern Denmark Cooperation with the Sudanese government to try al-Bashir could amount to legitimising those who themselves have been implicated in genocide |  Mattia Cacciatori, University of Bath The fact that al-Bashir has been deposed will again raise questions about the former Sudanese president facing trial at the ICC. | |  Luke Moffett, Queen's University Belfast The ICC is meant to be a Court of last resort, to ensure justice for victims and to end impunity. It's not living up to these promises. |  Marco Bocchese, University of Illinois at Chicago African leaders who have sought ICC involvement have all seen the court as being beneficial to the survival of their governments. | |  Yvonne McDermott, Swansea University The recent acquittals should be seen as a vindication of the ICC as an independent and impartial judicial institution. |
|
|
|
_____________________________
"Even a small dog can piss on a tall building", Jim Hightower
-------------------------------------------------
--
Disclaimer:Everyone posting to this Forum bears the sole responsibility for any legal consequences of his or her postings, and hence statements and facts must be presented responsibly. Your continued membership signifies that you agree to this disclaimer and pledge to abide by our Rules and Guidelines.To unsubscribe from this group, send email to: ugandans-at-heart+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ugandans at Heart (UAH) Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
ugandans-at-heart+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ugandans-at-heart/CAD1BwBDLFDOYwmDX_DsBEVVFRa6Zp1CXSoO57QWKUb0Y7hHfkQ%40mail.gmail.com.
0 comments:
Post a Comment