{UAH} THE NEW STUDY ON HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE IS SHOCKINGLY IRRESPONSIBLE

Friends

 

This is the point where we all must be very careful with the destroyed western press, honestly the information is out there, feed on the CNN back pipe very carefully, for the only thing coming out of it is carbon monoxide. Never good for you. And we have seen it on many times , just yesterday the Surgeon General said that since we are approaching the flu season, it is important that Americans take their flu shots, for in case we have a second wave of COVID-19 the system is going to be overloaded. Walah CNN read “The Surgeon General has just stated that there is a second wave of COVID-19 coming, and it is going to be worse than the current one.”

 

Where the heck did they get that one from?

 

Now let us go to the study that was made about hydroxychloroquine that Allan Barigye is now jumping up and down with. The study is shockingly irresponsible, and it should totally be removed from the net, for it is agenda driven, we never allow political agendas to drive our medical statements. That might explain why it was printed with out being pre-viewed as all medical studies are done. These observations are always raised by fair media, the danger we have at the beating on Trump age, is that when you throw a piece out there, no matter how garbagged it is, the fakes jump on it and the gasoline tanks get opened up. Think this through, do we really have a tablet in American hospitals murdering patients and we are just throwing it into the patient’s throats? For ta tis exactly what CNN NBC BBC pumped out there. Good Lord you hate Donald trump to a degree that you believe people are being murdered in hospitals and no one does anything about it? For Governors are scrambling for it, Andrew Cuomo a Democrat just took firkin trailer of the drugs to his state. Or all of them are in with trump to murder Americans?

 

For the first time, fake media in town was touting this study as Mana from heaven, as top virologists were torching it and all over the place. Look when you present a medical study it is read and considered all over the world, there are virologists out there that take it serious, they read it and compare what you have stated with their notes, especially when you do it on a drug they are not only interested into but have done a study on too. American press is becoming a firkin joke, for they have passed a class of fakes into cheap fakes. The Germanys are attacking it, the British are attacking it, now the French have attacked it too, yet Allan Barigye is in UAH selling it. This crap should have never been posted for on what I have read about it, this does not even qualify as a study. It is probably some Democrat hawk that threw it out there and the fake media lightened its face with a glee. Friends it is so sad that we’ve lost the press in Western countries for one of those days we are going to have an emanate catastrophe and no one is going to believe it for the information will be coming out of CNN, BBC torched half the entire yesterday touting this study, way back they would be investigating the credibility about a study before they sell it, but this Trump and beating on him pays large. When you include medical information into your beating on trump arsenal, you are screwed large.

 

Below is the French attack on the study they have just posted.

===============================================

Renowned French Dr. Didier Raoult issued a response to biases in the study critical of hydroxychloroquine

TechStartups Team Posted On April 22, 2020

As we said countless times in many of our articles, hydroxychloroquine has become the most controversial drug since President Trump touted the malaria drug as a potential game-changer. Ever since, the mainstream media has repeatedly labeled the drug has “unproven.” With anecdotal evidences that the drug has saved many lives, it seems that anti-Trump sentiment is driving the news cycle about hydroxychloroquine.

Yesterday, there was a study published on Medrxiv by Maganoli et al that claimed that more evidence now hints that hydroxychloroquine doesn’t help treat COVID-19.  In the study, the authors said they found no evidence that the use of hydroxychloroquine, either with or without azithromycin, reduced the risk of mechanical ventilation in patients hospitalized with Covid-19.

Now, renowned French Dr. Didier Raoult is responding to the authors, citing biases in the conclusion of the study. “The study published in pre-print on 04/21 on Medrxiv by Maganoli et al has three major biases which invalidate its conclusions, in any case absurd and incompatible with the literature,”  Dr. Raoult wrote.

In a post on Twitter, Dr. Raoult asked: “Regarding the Mahevas study in Medrxiv. Could the authors explain why 8 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine were counted in the control group? Moreover, could they inform the public about the clinical outcome of these patients?”

Regarding the Mahevas study in Medrxiv.
Could the authors explain why 8 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine were counted in the control group?
Moreover, could they inform the public about the clinical outcome of these patients? https://t.co/iSFSIvE2Dm pic.twitter.com/WBZh2d78Dr

— Didier Raoult (@raoult_didier) April 22, 2020

In a two-page response paper, Dr. Raoult said the following:

“In the current period, it seems that passion dominates rigorous and balanced scientific analysis and may lead to scientific misconduct. The article by Magagnoli et al. (Magagnoli, 2020) is an absolutely spectacular example of this. Indeed, in this work, it is concluded, in the end, that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) would double the mortality in patients with COVID with a fatality rate of 28% (versus 11% in the NoHCQ group), which is extraordinarily hard to believe. The analysis of the data shows two major biases, which show a welling to be convinced before starting the work :

The first is that lymphopenia is twice as common in the HCQ groups (25% in the HCQ, 31% in the HCQ+AZ group versus 14% in the no HCQ group, p =.02) and there is an absolute correlation between lymphopenia (<0.5G/L) and fatality rate, which is well known (Tan, 2020) and confirmed here : 28% deaths, 22% and 11% in the HCQ, HCQ+AZ and No HCQ group, respectively. Lymphopenia is the most obvious criterion of patient severity (in our cohort, lymphocytes in dead individuals (n=22, mean ± standard deviation, 0.94 ± 0.45), versus in the living (n=2405, 1.79 ± 0.84, p < .0001)). As the authors acknowledge, the severity of the patients in the different groups was very different, and their analysis can only make sense if there is a selection of patients with the same degree of severity, i.e. the same percentage of lymphopenia.

The second major bias is that in an attempt to provide meaningful data, by eliminating the initial severity at the time of treatment, two tables are shown: one table where drugs are prescribed before intubation, and which shows no significant difference in the 3 different groups (9/90 (10%) in the HCQ group, 11/101 (10. 9%) HCQ+AZ, and 15/177 (8.5%) in the group without HCQ, chi-square = 0.47, ddl = 2, p = 0.79), and one table, where it is not clear when the drugs were prescribed, where there are significant differences.

These differences are most likely related to the fact that the patients had been intubated for some before receiving hydroxychloroquine in desperation. It is notable that this is unreasonable at the time of the cytokine storm, as it is unlikely that hydrochloroquine alone would be able to control patients at this stage of the disease.

Moreover, incomprehensibly, the “untreated” group actually received azithromycin in 30% of cases, without this group being analyzed in any distinct way. Azithromycin is also a proposed treatment for COVID (Gautret, 2020) with in vitro efficacy (Andreani, 2020), and to mix it with patients who are supposedly untreated is something that is closer to scientific fraud than reasonable analysis.

Altogether these 3 voluntary biases are all pushing to the idea of dangerosity of hydroxychloroquine safest drug as reported on nearly 1 million people (Lane, 2020). All in all, this is a work that shows that, in this period, it is possible to propose things that do not stand up to any methodological analysis to try to demonstrate that one is right.”

EM         -> { Trump for 2020 }

On the 49^th Parallel          

                 Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja and Dr. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda is in anarchy"
                    Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja na Dk. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda ni katika machafuko"

hydroxychloroquine