{UAH} THE TRAIN CREATING A FRAUDLENT IS NOT WISE TO BOARD

The integrity of the vote is the foundation of democracy

by Rep. Tom McClintock

 November 19, 2020 12:00 AM

The nature of democracy is that in every election, there is a winner and a loser. The success of democracy depends on the loser believing the vote was fair and accepting the result. This is why the vote is not the foundation of our democracy — the integrity of the vote is its foundation.

That is just as important for the winner as it is for the loser. The winners depend on the integrity of the vote for their legitimacy. The losers depend on it for their acceptance.

That is precisely the issue in the aftermath of this election. The widespread allegations of illegal votes and illegal processes must be resolved before the election can confer legitimacy. Among these is the acceptance of ballots received after Election Day, votes cast by ineligible voters, backdated ballots, illegally duplicated ballots, voting systems that misallocated votes, and counting votes outside any meaningful observation.

There is either evidence to support these allegations, or there is not. Fortunately, we are blessed with a well-established system of administrative and judicial review to answer these questions.

Georgia, for example, is now undertaking an audit and hand count. The audit should resolve some concerns over illegal votes, and the hand count should resolve concerns over illegal processes. Meanwhile, judges across the country are now weighing evidence to support similar complaints.

So perhaps we should all calm down, stop the hyperbolic rhetoric, and allow this process to unfold as it should. Our system is more than capable of working through these issues and providing answers that can satisfy both sides.

We also need to ask ourselves why so many people believe the election was riddled with fraud. A big reason may be that so many safeguards against it have been systematically removed.

We call it “Election Day” for a reason. Until recently, we all waited until the campaigns were over and every candidate had had his or her say.

Then, on a single day, Election Day, we personally went to our local polling place in what George Will has called, “The communion of democracy.” We all took the time because we knew it was important. We brought our children to watch the process, and we taught them to respect it.

The polling place was often in a neighbor’s garage or the local elementary school. Each of us looked our neighbors on the precinct board in the eye as we identified ourselves and signed the roll. They then handed us our ballot. We immediately took that ballot into a curtained booth where no one could look over our shoulder or plead or threaten or cajole us to vote a certain way. We cast our vote in absolute privacy, according to our own conscience, and then handed that ballot back to our neighbor, who immediately placed it into a locked ballot box in the presence of observers from all parties.

It was very hard to commit fraud in such a system because every ballot had a clear and simple chain of custody. At 8 p.m., the total number of votes was known, and the count began under the watchful eye of observers. We usually knew the results of most elections by 10 p.m. that night or maybe midnight in a tight race.

Consider how we have perverted that simple and secure process upon which we once prided ourselves. Today, ballots are mailed out to voter rolls that contain untold numbers of people who have moved or died. There is no chain of custody from the time the ballot is mailed until the time it is returned. In many states, ballot harvesters can knock on doors and collect these surplus ballots.

Even legitimate ballots can be cast weeks before the debate has concluded and under the duress of family, friends, or precinct workers.

This corrupted process cannot continue. Even if it doesn’t rob our elections of their actual legitimacy, it certainly robs them of their perceived legitimacy, destroying the trust that the loser of any election must have to accept and respect the decision of the electorate.

The traditional process assured the presumption of fairness. The new process offers none. Acceptance of an election cannot be obtained by browbeating — it can only be earned by a full and open review of the integrity of the election, establishing for all people that their vote was fairly and accurately recorded and that the result speaks as the will of the nation.

Rep. Tom McClintock, a Republican, represents California’s 4th Congressional District.

EM         -> { Trump for 2020 }

On the 49^th Parallel          

                 Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja and Dr. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda is in anarchy"
                    Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja na Dk. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda ni katika machafuko"