[UAH] Fw: Your Civil Rights & Constitutional Law Updates

AROMA PATRICK-THE TRUE SON OF UGANDA!!!THIS IS MY COUNTRY!!!THIS IS MY MOTHERLAND-THE PEARL OF AFRICA DOES NOT BELONG TO THE MAFIAS ALONE,I WHO IS WALKING IN THE SHADOWS OF DEATH DAILY  AND LIVING  ON BORROWED TIMES  UNDER GOD'S PROTECTION  SINCE I SHOULD HAVE BEEN DEAD,BURIED SIX FEET UNDER-I,THE UNWANTED AND HATED,THE MOST VILIFIED AND SABOTAGED,THE DOWNTRODDEN AND CRIPPLED,THE INNOCENTLY DELIBERATELY TORTURED AND PERSECUTED IS ALSO A SHAREHOLDER AND A STAKEHOLDER WITH FULL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS TO PARTICIPATE IN ITS DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSFORMATION IN ALL SECTORS AND SPHERES-NO GOING TO EXILE,NO RETREAT AND NO SURRENDER TO THE MAFIAS!!!THE END MUST SET ALL UGANDANS FREE AND CREATE A BETTER LIFE FOR ALL!!! "THE RIGHT TO BE TREATED WITH RESPECT AND COURTESY,THE RIGHT TO LIVE AND THE RIGHT TO DIGNITY ARE NOT FAVORS TO BE BESTOWED BY ANYBODY:THEY ARE THE BIRTH RIGHT OF EVERY HUMAN BEING"DECLARES PRESIDENT YOWERI MUSEVENI AT THE BEGINNING OF HIS BUSH WAR IN 1981!!!page 182-The Minds of Achievers-The Seeds of Greatness by GRACE MUSIIME MUGYENZI,Get a copy of this book at Uganda Book Shop-Opposite Communication House,Kampala.

MANAGING DIRECTOR
CAMKWOKI INVESTMENTS LIMITED
Dealers in General Merchandise, Agro Input and Chemicals and Agro- Processing
LIRA BUS PARK  SHOP NO:57/ LABOURLINE TRADING CENTER AND BAL-PE MARKET ON ALEBTONG-BARR ROAD 
P.O Box 268-LIRA,TEL:+256-782-658-458 

A VICTIM OF APARTHEID ETHNICALLY ENTRENCHED GENOCIDAL CUM TERRORIST MAFIA DICTATORSHIP OF MUSEVENI,SUPER -BLOODY MAFIA STRATEGIST AMAMA MBABAZI,THE DEADLY SAM ENGOLA/MUSEVENI LANGO HENCHMAN  AND THEIR MAFIAS OPPOSITION/LANGO MAFIA  NETWORKS PLUS A VICTIM OF NORTHERN UGANDA NRM GRAND HUMAN RESOURCE DESTRUCTION POLICY OF ITS POTENTIALS AND GRAND NRM ECONOMIC SABOTAGE PLANS TO KEEP THE NORTH PERPETUALLY IN POVERTY/TURN US INTO BEGGARS,A NORTHERN UGANDA GENOCIDE SURVIVOR,MY RIGHT LEG BROKEN ON 24/JUNE/2001 IN  FRONT OF SAM ENGOLA LIRA HOTEL IN THE PRESENCE OF PRESIDENTIAL GUARD BRIGADE WHO PROTECTED MUSEVENI IN LIRA WHILE CAMPAIGNING FOR SAM ENGOLA THAT DAY-SURVIVING DEATH MIRACULOUSLY DUE TO GOD'S PROTECTION  AND I ESCAPED SEVERAL MURDER ATTEMPTS ON MY LIFE  RIGHT FROM 2000 TO DATE-POLITICALLY PERSECUTED,ECONOMICALLY SABOTAGED IN BUSINESS AND MY NGO PROJECTS, DENIED ALL THE OPPORTUNITIES IN LIFE/ EDUCATION-EXPELLED FROM MAKERERE UNIVERSITY IN FOURTH YEAR  WHILE PURSUING BACHELOR OF LAWS  AND COMPLETELY FRUSTRATED IN TERMS OF PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT,SOCIALLY DISLOCATED -ISOLATED AND LIVING IN PAINED PHYSICALLY,MENTALLY,EMOTIONALLY WHILE SPIRITUALLY FOUGHT WITH NRM EVIL SPIRITS(MAYEMBES/KIFARO) AND CULTURALLY UPROOTED BECAUSE OF OPPOSING/DISAGREEING WITH MUSEVENI & HIS NRM MAFIA POLITICAL  PARTY,HAILING FROM A WRONG REGION/ TRIBE/CLAN .I PATRICK AROMA TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AFFIRM AND CONFIRM THAT WHAT I HAVE STATED HERE IS THE TRUTH AND THE WHOLE TRUTH NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.CAN YOU IMAGINE THIS BEING DONE TO YOU OR YOUR SON BY YOUR OWN GOVERNMENT??? A MAFIA GOVERNMENT IN MY OWN MOTHERLAND WHO HATES TO SEE MY PROGRESS, PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PROSPERITY -IF THIS IS NOT APARTHEID THEN WHAT IS IT ??? FROM 1999-2004 I WAS ON TEL:NO 0772-621-761 which MTN MADE IT IN ACCESSIBLE/BLOCKED AND LATER SOLD TO ANOTHER PERSON BEFORE TAKING ON 0782-658-458.ALL MY COMMUNICATIONS AT THAT MATERIAL TIME CAN BE ACCESSED ON 0772-621-761. MY FIFTY YEARS DEADLY JOURNEY TO THE GOLDEN TRAGEDIES OF OUR MOTHERLAND-WHY I NEVER CELEBRATED THE  JUBILEE!!!
1962-1975-1 was not yet born
1976-1979-IDI AMIN MURDERED MY UNCLES THE LATE HON: AROMA MARTIN,EMOR BEN AND MY FATHER THE LATE PETER OGWAL 
1980-1986
WE SURVIVED ON RELIEF FOOD (YELLO POSHO +BEANS) under very difficult conditions as orphans though we had plenty of cattle that was eventually stolen by NRM/UPDF
1986-2000 My Childhood Destruction
NRA/UPDF STOLE ALL OUR CATTLE WHEN I WAS LOOKING AFTER THEM AND RAPED MY COUSIN SISTER IN MY PRESENCE
Museveni SURAMBAYA FIGHTER JETS BOMBS OUR HOME VILLAGE-FIVE KILOMETERS FROM LIRA TOWN AND I SURVIVED AS MANY INNOCENT CIVILIANS WERE KILLED PLUS LIVE STOCKS
Alice Lakwena War BEGAN that really exposed us to a lot of dead bodies bombed,shot and cut with matchetes LYING LIFELESS FROM OUR VILLAGE TO LIRA TOWN
Gen: David Tinyefuza OPERATIONS NORTH where even Children were not spared KIBOKO-we were thoroughly caned by UPDF as they arrested the 18 famous Northern Uganda Politicians at that material time
2000-2012
NRA Mafias start my PERSECUTION at Makerere University
Breaking of my leg
Expulsion from Makerere
Museveni STATE HOUSE PLUS THEIR MAFIA NETWORKS ON MY HOT PURSUIT DEVISING ALL STRATEGIES TO MURDER ME
 2012 ON WARDS• STILL SURVIVING THE MAFIAS,LIVING IN FEAR AND PAIN,BEING HUNTED LEFT,RIGHT AND CENTER BY MAFIAS PLUS THEIR NETWORKS.• ON 29/JANUARY/2004 DURING RADIO ONE EKIMEEZA TALKSHOW AT CLUB OBBLIGATTO I REVEALED THE PRESENCE OF MUSEVENI CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION BOUGHT FROM NORTH KOREA AND IRAN-THAT WAS HIDDEN UNDER GULU AIRPORT HUNKER AND THE UNITED NATIONS GRABBED,DESTROYED AND TOOK AWAY THE REMAINING ONES TO UNKNOWN DESTINATION-THIS IS ONE REASON WHY PRESIDENT MUSEVENI AND HIS MAFIAS CAN NEVER-NEVER-I SAY NEVER FORGIVE ME SINCE I EXPOSED AND SPOILED THEIR DEADLY DESTRUCTIVE AGENDA FOR NORTHERN UGANDA!!!
ON-TOP OF THE ABOVE,NO TERM LIMITS PROMOTING LIFE PRESIDENCY, CREATING HOPELESSNESS, UNCERTAINTY & CONSOLIDATING APARTHIED PLUS TRIBALISM, THERE IS MASSIVE POVERTY,UNEMPLOYMENT,HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES,IMPUNITY,MURDERS,INEQUALITY,GENOCIDE,DISUNITY IN THE COUNTRY!!!

S e n t f r o m m y B l a c k B e r r y ® s m a r t p h o n e

---

From: JD Supra Advisories <legalupdates@jdsupra.com>

Sender: "JD Supra Advisories" <legalupdates=jdsupra.com@mail316.us3.mcdlv.net>

Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:58:51 +0000

To: <aromaguzi@gmail.com>

ReplyTo: JD Supra Advisories <legalupdates@jdsupra.com>

Subject: Your Civil Rights & Constitutional Law Updates

Follow Other Topics » Email to Colleague »     Civil Rights & Constitutional Law   Legal intelligence from leading lawyers and law firms     Supreme Court Limits Employer Liability in Title VII Cases   The United States Supreme Court ("Court") issued two decisions on June 24, 2013, significantly limiting employer liability in discrimination cases brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. ("Title VII").... By: Phillips Lytle LLP     Supreme Court decision will impact land-development projects nationwide   In a decision that will impact land-development projects nationwide, the U.S. Supreme Court held this week that the government may not condition a land-use permit on mitigation requirements that do not have an essential "nexus" and "rough... By: Saul Ewing LLP     No Punitive Damages Awards by Human Rights Commission, Illinois Supreme Court Rules   Late last week, in a unanimous opinion by Justice Rita Garman, the Illinois Supreme Court held that the Cook County Commission on Human Rights lacks any authority to award punitive damages.... By: Sedgwick LLP     Supreme Court Invalidates Voting Rights Act Formula: Arizona and Other Covered Jurisdictions Are No Longer Subject to the Preclearance Requirement   The United States Supreme Court (the Court) struck down part of the Voting Rights Act (the Act) this week, freeing nine states, including Arizona, and dozens of counties from federal oversight of their voting laws.... By: Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.     Breaking News! Insurers sue HUD regarding disparate impact   We just heard that a lawsuit was filed in Federal District Court in DC challenging HUD's final rule stating that the disparate impact theory will apply in assessing whether a company has complied with the Fair Housing Act.... By: Ballard Spahr LLP     Employment And Labor Insight: Employers Win Big Before The U.S. Supreme Court   As the United States Supreme Court wraps up its term, employers should take note of three decisions issued this past Monday, June 24.... By: Leonard, Street and Deinard     IP Update, Vol. 16, No. 6, June 2013   Patents / Patent Eligible Subject Matter - Supreme Court to Myriad: Isolated DNA Sequences Are Not Patent-Eligible Subject Matter -- AMP et al. v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.: In a 9–0 decision the Supreme Court of the United States held that... By: McDermott Will & Emery     U.S. Supreme Court Rules Defense of Marriage Act is Unconstitutional   Today, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 vote that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional. The decision in United States v. Windsor means that same-sex couples who are married under state law will be treated as... By: Ballard Spahr LLP     Employment Law Commentary -- Volume 25, Issue 6 -- June 2013: A Trap for the Unwary: EEOC Pushes Back on Overly Expansive Severance Agreements   A familiar, if unsettling, trend the past four years has been layoffs. The calculus behind them is simple: companies need to cut costs to stay afloat amidst the weak economy, and reducing the size of their workforce is a means to that end. However,... By: Morrison & Foerster LLP     U.S. Supreme Court Adopts a Narrow Definition of a Supervisor in Harassment Claims   Resolving a split among the circuits, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a "supervisor" for Title VII harassment liability is limited to those who have the power to take a tangible employment action against the alleged victim (e.g., hire, fire, demote,... By: Orrick - Global Employment Law Group     When Words Are Not Text: Don't Bring a Knife to a Gun Fight   Appellate advocacy often comes down to a conflict over the meaning of words. The Supreme Court's opinion in Vance v. Ball State Univ. provides graphic proof that not all fights over terminology are created equal. Advocates must understand the nature... By: Sedgwick LLP     Legal Alert: Top 10 Considerations for Employee Benefit Plans After Windsor   Yesterday's U.S. Supreme Court decision in United States v. Windsor struck down Section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) as unconstitutional, and held that the federal government must recognize and accept same-sex marriages recognized... By: Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP     The Supreme Court Decision on the Defense of Marriage Act: An Employer's Perspective   In a closely watched and eagerly anticipated decision, the Supreme Court, in United States v. Windsor, __ U.S. ___ (June 26, 2013) has overturned Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which limited the definition of marriage for federal law... By: BakerHostetler     First Circuit Affirms $675,000 Award Against Joel Tenenbaum: Gore Test Does not Apply to Statutory Damages under Copyright Act   This week, the First Circuit affirmed a $675,0000 statutory damages award against college student Joel Tenenbaum for copyright infringement. The Court held that the damages award, based on Tenenbaum's illegal downloading and distribution of 30... By: Foley Hoag LLP - Trademark, Copyright &     Supreme Court Allows Gay Marriage To Resume in California   The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday sent back a challenge to California's gay marriage ban for lack of standing, which will most likely bring full marriage equality to the state.... By: Lawyers.com     Who's the Boss? In Vance, Supreme Court Defines "Supervisor" for Purposes of Title VII Harassment Claims   Since two landmark U.S. Supreme Court decisions in 1998, the courts have applied different rules to sexual and other discriminatory harassment claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII") based on whether the harasser is a... By: Holland & Knight LLP     Appeals Court Hears Argument on N.J. Sports Betting Law, With Uncertain Outcome   Very lively oral arguments were held today, June 26, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on the New Jersey sports betting law, in a case that will have an enormous impact on the future of sports betting in the United States.... By: Jeff Ifrah     US Supreme Court Limits Governmental Power to Impose Conditions on New Development   The extent to which governmental authorities may condition land use permits on exactions and concessions from land use permit applicants has received extraordinary attention from the United States Supreme Court in recent years. On June 25, the Court... By: Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis     U.S. Supreme Court Rules DOMA Unconstitutional in Estate Tax Case   The Supreme Court has held that the Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA") is unconstitutional. DOMA defined "marriage" and "spouse" to the exclusion of same-sex partners for purposes of federal law.... By: BakerHostetler     Supreme Court Strikes down Voting Rights Act's 'Preclearance' Formula   In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court held Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 unconstitutional. Section 4 contained the legislative formula to determine which jurisdictions must get "preclearance" from the federal government to change their... By: Ballard Spahr LLP     Tax Law Blog: Tax Implications of DOMA Ruling   The Supreme Court's ruling in the case of Windsor v. United States, holding part of the Defense Of Marriage Act unconstitutional, will have important tax repercussions.... By: Davis Brown Law Firm     7th Circuit Affirms Socializing Costs of Multi-Value Electric Transmission Projects   On June 7, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit issued a decision in Illinois Commerce Commission, et al. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, affirming Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") orders that conditionally... By: Davis Wright Tremaine LLP     Unconstitutionality of Defense Of Marriage Act Has Broad Reaching Implications For Tax and Wealth Planning And Tax Compliance Of Same-Sex Married Couples   This morning, the Supreme Court issued two historic rulings on the constitutionality of same-sex marriage. The first ruling, in a 5-4 decision, struck down as unconstitutional a key provision of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which... By: Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger     A Summary of the U.S. Supreme Court Decisions This Week Which Will Affect Employers   Windsor v. United States - Issue: Can the federal government define marriage? Holding: No. Loser: The federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which was passed in 1996 and signed by President Clinton, was expressly overturned by this... By: Miller & Martin PLLC     U.S. Supreme Court Rejects the Mixed-Motive Analysis in Retaliation Claims   The U.S. Supreme Court held on Monday that a plaintiff alleging retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII") must prove that retaliation was the "but-for" reason for an adverse employment decision.... By: Orrick - Global Employment Law Group     DOMA Ruling Opens Up Estate Planning Options for Same-Sex Married Couples   On June 26 the United States Supreme Court held the Federal Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA") unconstitutional. The Defense of Marriage Act prevented a marriage between two individuals of the same sex from being recognized for federal purposes.... By: Partridge Snow & Hahn LLP     Employers Prevail In Two U.S. Supreme Court Decisions   The U.S. Supreme Court issued two closely watched decisions Monday affecting Title VII cases.... By: Pierce Atwood LLP     Employers Cannot Access Applicant or Employee Personal Social Media Accounts, Says Nevada   On June 13, 2013, Nevada's governor signed A.B. 181 to restrict employer access to applicants' and employees' personal password-protected social media accounts, adding to the state's existing anti-discrimination statute that recently was amended to... By: Proskauer Rose LLP     HoneyBaked Ham to Pay $370K to Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment and Retaliation Lawsuit   Female Employees Subjected to Sexual Harassment by Male Supervisor and Retaliated Against for Complaining, Federal Agency Charged - DENVER - The Original HoneyBaked Ham Company of Georgia, based in Alpharetta, Ga., will pay $370,000 and furnish... By: U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission     Gender Identity Now A Protected Class In Delaware   Delaware is now the 17th state in addition to the District of Columbia to prohibit discrimination based on gender identity and expression.... By: XpertHR - Partnered with LexisNexis     Two Major Supreme Court Wins for Employers   On Monday, June 24, 2013, the Supreme Court issued two 5-4 rulings in important cases affecting the employment world, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar and Vance v. Ball State University. By making it harder for plaintiffs to... By: Dinsmore & Shohl LLP     Legal Alert: Supreme Court Sets Heightened Standard For Proving Retaliation Claims   On June 24, 2013, the United States Supreme Court heightened the burden of proof for employees bringing retaliation claims under Title VII by holding that employees have to prove that the employer's desire to retaliate was the "but-for" cause for the... By: FordHarrison     What the DOMA Decision Means for Your Workplace   Unless you are on a news media embargo, you have probably heard the news by now. The United States Supreme Court today issued a watershed ruling regarding the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the law barring the federal government from recognizing... By: NAVEX Global     Supreme Court Rules that Lower Courts Failed to Apply Rigorous Enough Scrutiny to Racial Classification in Higher Education Admissions   In a 7-1 opinion, the United States Supreme Court concluded in Fisher v. Univ. of Texas, No. 11-345 (June 24, 2013) that lower courts had failed to apply a rigorous enough scrutiny to the University of Texas' use of racial classification in its... By: Holland & Knight LLP     Healthcare Reform White Paper: Countdown To 2014   Although the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("PPACA" or the "Act") is now over three years old, the Act's core requirements will not take effect until 2014.... By: McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC     DOMA Ruled Unconstitutional on Equal Protection Grounds   The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in United States v. Windsor that the Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA") is unconstitutional. The decision of the Court applies to same-sex couples who are legally married as defined by their state of residence.... By: Mintz Levin - Immigration     U.S. Supreme Court Rules For Property Owner In Important Takings Case   In a 5-4 decision, the U. S. Supreme Court expanded the reach of the requirement that there be a "nexus" and "rough proportionality" between the impacts of a proposed development and governmental conditions imposed on the development. Koontz v. St.... By: Perkins Coie     Rogers Towers: Discharge and the Unscheduled Debt: Discharge Requires Due Process   Often referred to as the "holy grail" of bankruptcy law, a bankruptcy discharge releases the debtor from personal liability for certain specified types of debts.... By: Rogers Towers     Denying Land-Use Approval if a Land Owner Will Not Pay for Mitigation Efforts Triggers Heightened Constitutional Scrutiny - U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Involved Water Management District's Denial of Permit Conditioned on Wetlands Mitigation   If a governmental authority denies approval of a land-use permit because an applicant refuses to spend money on a government project, such as a mitigation project, the government must defend its denial under heightened constitutional scrutiny.... By: Best Best & Krieger LLP     Seattle Latest City to "Ban the Box" for Private Employers   On June 20, 2013, the Mayor of Seattle signed an ordinance to "ban the box" and otherwise restrict the use of arrest and conviction records in the hiring and personnel decisions of most private employers and of the City itself.... By: Proskauer Rose LLP     How Does The Fall Of DOMA Impact The FMLA And Other Employee Benefits?   Unless you've been securely wedged under a rock over the past 24 hours, you know that the U.S. Supreme Court has declared unconstitutional the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which had established a federal definition of marriage as a legal union... By: Franczek Radelet P.C.     Legal Alert: Supreme Court Strikes Portion Of DOMA   On June 26, 2013, the United States Supreme Court issued a pair of opinions favorable to the gay rights movement, ruling that married same-sex couples are entitled to federal benefits and, by declining to decide a case from California, effectively... By: FordHarrison     Employment Law Blog: What does the DOMA ruling mean for employers?   Today the United States Supreme Court ruled, in United States v. Windsor, that the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that prohibited the federal government from recognizing same-sex couples who are legally married in their state violates the... By: Davis Brown Law Firm     In Windsor, Supreme Court Finds Federal Defense of Marriage Act Unconstitutional   By a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court ruled yesterday that Section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional insofar as it purports to limit the terms "marriage" and "spouse" to opposite-gender couples for all purposes of federal... By: Holland & Knight LLP     The Supreme Court Clarifies Who Is a Supervisor Under Title VII   In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court decided what the definition of a "supervisor" is for purposes of assessing liability for unlawful harassment under Title VII. The Court ruled that an employer will be vicariously liable for the actions of a... By: Littler     Inconsistent Reasons for Termination Allow Pregnant Employee's Discrimination Case to Proceed to Jury   The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently overturned a lower court's grant of summary judgment in favor of a home care agency, holding that a jury should be allowed to determine whether the agency's reasons for firing an employee were, in fact, a... By: Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,     Supreme Court Issues Important Affirmative Action And Employment Law Decisions   This week the Supreme Court issued three decisions that may significantly impact federal contractors and other employers: In Fisher v. University of Texas, No. 11-345 (U.S. June 24, 2013), the Supreme Court held that a university admissions... By: Proskauer - Government Contractor Compliance     The Estate Planning Impact of the Supreme Court's Ruling on DOMA   As discussed in a recent post, I anticipated that the Supreme Court's ruling in the matter of United States v. Windsor would have a significant impact on estate planning matters for same-sex married couples. The Court issued its opinion on June 26,... By: Niles, Barton & Wilmer, LLP     Rajaratnam Appeal: Is Snowden Right That Big Brother Is Listening?   On Monday, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan affirmed the 2011 insider trading conviction of Raj Rajaratnam, founder of the Galleon Group hedge funds.... By: Morvillo Abramowitz Grand Iason & Anello P.C.     Court Stops Serial Plaintiff's Latest Effort: Payne v. Chapel Hill North Properties   The United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina recently dismissed an Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") case filed by Denise Payne, a Florida resident, and National Alliance for Accessibility, Inc. ("NAA"), a... By: Poyner Spruill LLP     See more Civil Rights & Constitutional Law advisories ›   Forward to Colleague »  |  Follow Other Topics »   Did a colleague forward this email to you? Sign up here to start receiving emails.   You received this email because you opted to do so via JD Supra. To stop receiving this digest, manage your subject subscriptions or unsubscribe from all.   JD Supra 10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300 Sausalito, CA 94965 Phone: 800-506-6010 (toll free)