{UAH} Enjoyment

 

The word is aprior, my grammar check software could not recognize it.

Enjoyment: it is definable and it is within human understanding.

For the above purpose therefore, culture in this article, will be referred to as sociologia to avoid its anthropological pitfalls and limitations.

Enjoyment is quadratic – in a four planar social cube. This is not the common belief of what enjoyment (lexicon interpretation).  I will avoid its etymology since it does not describe our world now and in the past.  

Enjoyment as a quadrapolar, and involves;

a.       enablement

b.      constraints

c.       love

d.      work

All the above are social activities.

These four bonds the individual to society in a Bhaskarian four planar social cube.

Unfortunately, the word love currently has gross misrepresentations in a sociologically meaningful sense, hence all the issues involved with it. Work has also been misconstrued in theoretical economics consequently rampant unemployment and issues associated with it.

Please notice that love is a social activity and enables a constrained world through work. Take an example of a child – without a concept and language. It will learn about loving a baby dolly through imitation and working on that imitation. (sociologia genesis or anthropogenesis)

I do not know if sociology is still interested in the debate about what an individual as opposed to society is.

The above defines humanism and its social bonds (relegare). Maybe the question is to understand the sociometrics involved – the data you requested for.

<<<<Yet, specifics are still wanting. Furthermore, it commits the fallacy of argumentum ad populum.<<<<<<

 

Enjoyment is a sociologia founded – and hence has a social meaning that should be appended to it. You listen to folk music for example? One can't simply love all world folk music. Some we simply can't understand it we simply have a language or concept for it.  Seen an individual dancing ballet? They work to love it. The Masia dance jumping up and down around in circle. They enjoy the dance. Some Indian tribes in the Amazon, dance around, in a circle.  

Is the Masia, Indian or ballet dance meaningless? Absolutely not!

These are social activities with social implications and deeper meanings – with enjoyment and fulfillment, loaded with collective inferences. Induction, into the above activities by different communities has to be worked for in order to be loved and enjoyed collectivity. Such as activities defines human society structures referred to as anthropomorphology .

I hope now you can sit down and reason and also find a solution for drug abuse, violent crime as linked let say to pop music.

 Dan

===============

Dan Bawanika wrote:

 

'It is not an a prior [sic] assumption, for there is more than enough data about youth deaths in 

Europe.'

 

Yet, specifics are still wanting. Furthermore, it commits the fallacy of argumentum ad populum. 

 

2. "In the largest part of Europe, the number one killer of young people is suicide. 

Data shows ... "

 

Could you be more specific about the 'data' that establishes the afore assumption?

 

3. 'The question is loaded for we have to understand what enjoyment is all about...'

 

I doubt whether we can understand what enjoyment is all about. It is indefinable and it is also beyond understanding. Feelings oftentimes are unreliable devices. Besides, the self-same activity may not provide 'enjoyment' upon repetition. What a person may initially believe to provide him enjoyment, may not provide anticipated enjoyment. Contrarily, what may not have been assumed to provide enjoyment may actually provide enjoyment. Understanding something with wisdom of hindsight is superficial understanding.  

 

Abhinav 

 

 

 

_______________
Daniel Bwanika

www.idrc-ug.com

http://www.siup.ac.ug/wordpress/