{UAH} George:CAN TINYEFUZA AND CO. MILITARILY DISLODGE MUSEVENI? ///

George,

Please resend the stages again.........I must have missed out!

Look, with due respect, it pains me to say this but there isn't gonna be a people revolution in Uganda anytime soon. If it was to take place, it would have happened immediately after the 2006 elections because I strongly believe that Besigye won those elections. What we have got in Uganda at the moment is a population that has given up on politics of the country. They don't know who to trust in terms of leadership. A revolution without a trusted leadership is more like a genocide.......it cannot be anywhere near the definition of a liberation. People will just kill each other for no reason.

If you send a few Ugandans now on streets with a mission to take out Museveni's government, trust me, he will not even blink an eye to order the police and army to shoot them, even if the rest of his family were part of the protestors. You go and find out why but I've told you, brother. 

He will order for them to be shot, and if the Ssemujju's are making too much noise afterwards, he will compensate the families and even give them a state funeral if that's what they want. 

I really don't foresee a people revolution in the near future in Uganda. Colonel Samson Mande was quoted in the London Evening post saying that Museveni can still removed through elections. I laughed my head off because I didn't know Mande was this unserious yet he claims to be talking a lot recently. Which elections was he talking about? To be honest, I pity anybody putting their energy into the 2016 presidential elections. It's a waste of time and resources, if you ask me.

Abbey

Sent from my iPad

On 7 Oct 2013, at 05:13, George Okello <opallog@gmail.com> wrote:

Abbey,

 

A peoples democratic revolution can remove Museveni through the three stages I have outlined in my conversations with Robert Atuhairwe. We don't need any external support to remove the dictatorship. All we need from outside  is international solidarity. You seriously underestimate the power immanent in the determination of a people willing to make make sacrifices so as to liberate themselves. It is you prawn sandwich-munching politicos, fatefully attached to your imperialist master's apron string,s who think we somehow need to be puppets first in order to liberate oursleves.

 

George Okello

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Ssalongo Ssennoga <firstcall.ug@gmail.com> wrote:

Abbey, what are your sources?

Villager

On Sunday, October 6, 2013, Abbey Semuwemba <abbeysemuwemba@gmail.com> wrote:
> Rob,
> I don't think anybody is in a position to dislodge Museveni militarily without foreign help. It's just impossible and I'm sure even Tinyefunza knows it. 
> Abbey
>
> Sent from my iPad
> On 4 Oct 2013, at 17:19, "Robukui ." <robukui.1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> With the security forces involvement in election rigging, bribing of impoverished voters, cadre Judges in Courts of law, and NRM cadres in all structures of central and local government, there is no doubt Museveni can not be dislodged from power through constitutional means. He is so much power hungry that he can not even relinguish it to his son. He is simply grooming his son to take command of a special force that will protect his grip on power. However, should he succeed in gaining the Presidency of the East African Community (EAC), he will hand over to a figurehead president as he retains the Presidency behind the scenes. 
>
> Institutionalised abuse of office, corruption, gross violation of human rights, nepotism and theft of public resources have made Ugandans of all shades to bury their artificial differences and are united as one oppressed community. Museveni's old tactics of formenting ethinic and regionalism is nolonger tenable. The masses have lost faith in the electoral process. Its only Muntu and Mao who are focusing on the 2016 elections. 
>
> The opposition has done enough in rallying the masses to demand for their rights. A mass uprising in form of protests will be brutally crushed by Museveni's private security apparatus. Some Ugandans who sensed the danger of Museveni's governance resorted to unconstitutional means to dislodge him from power. However, Museveni managed to ruffocate the groups by playing the secterian card. UNRF 1 and 2, HSM, LRA, UPA were branded Anyanyas. ADF branded Islamic fundamentalists. Itongwa's NDA linked with Buganda's demand for Federalism. Its only the PRA that was nationalistic in character. Had it not been let down by the LRA, Congolese and Rwanda's sudden change of foreign policy, the PRA was to set to evolve into a national armed liberation movement. 
> Its now a decade since the conditions that gave rise to PRA came to the surface and the situation has now grown from worse to worst. But had the Rwanda backed PRA succeded, would it not have become a situation similar to what happened with Rwanda backed Kabila (Sr)! 
>
> Owing to the fact that the masses are more than ready for any means that can disloge Museveni there is no need of a protracted war. Since the Andrew Kayiira coup attempt of 1986 and the NRA Artillery based Capt Mugarra foiled coup attempt of 1988, Museveni has not faced any real coup threat. However, he has kept a close eye on General Tinyefuza as a potential coup plotter. His being sidelined from the mainstream military service alludes to that fear. The situation was worsened by the General's failled attempt to retire from the army. Since then the General has been a subject of intelligence surveillance. When he seemed to reconcile with Museveni, he was simply trying to entice Museveni to get him closer to security circles. No way, Museveni who is a master of deceit instead assigned him as Coordinator of Intelligence Services. Tinyefuza did not coordinate any intelligence but was instead a subject of 24 hours intelligence surveillance. 
>
> During his tenure the General is reported to have actively offered techinical advice to Museveni's efforts to suppress dissenters. The General thought that he would win the confidence of Museveni who would return him to the mainstream military in the hope that he would use it to kick out his Commander in Chief. When the General lost all hope he went wild with controvercial public statements. Though these outbursts amoumted to using a 'wrong forum', Museveni opted to ignore him. However, Tinyefuza is either not sincere or ignorant when he put himself in the same group with Aronda when he stated that they were targets of assassinations for opposing the Muhoozi project. Aronda will never part ways with Museveni. Museveni must have known that the General intended to flee but looked the other side in the hope that it is easy to manage him in exile than when he is close to his army.
>
> In exile the General has declared intentions of overthrowing Museveni. He is moblising Ugandans for that purpose. There is no doubt Tinyefuza's declarations are a big threat to Museveni. Therefore, Museveni's main preoccupation now is how to 'deal with' Tinyefuza in the same way the Rwanda government tried to deal with its own renegade General Kayumba in South Africa.
>
> It is only a timely and well planned decisive military strike that will seen Museveni's NRA defect en masse leaving Muhoozi's SFG to battle it alone. Rwanda if not occupied with its own strike will send its infantry to Museveni's aid. Kenya will

--

Village Boy

 

Everything and nothing for Peace

--
UAH forum is devoted to matters of interest to Ugandans and Africans in general. Individuals are responsible for whatever they post on this forum.To unsubscribe from this group, send email to: ugandans-at-heart+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com or Abbey Semuwemba at: abbeysemuwemba@gmail.com.