UAH is secular, intellectual and non-aligned politically, culturally or religiously email discussion group.


SV: {UAH} ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT ISIS

Hanna, the USA APPEARS AT A FIX:

On the one hand, they are forced to work with Iranian SHIA, which is a good thing.

One the other, it is the USA's best ally SAUDI ARABIA AND GULF STATE SUNNIS who are financing ISIS.

And then we have Syrian SHIAS  whom the USA wanted to overthrow.Let alone the Kurds. 

aND THE USA says it's motive is to maintain a unitary Iraq!?

Now they drawing back.
Amen!!
Noc'l
 
"WE FORM THE CULTURE THAT FORMS US"….noc'la gaumoy.


Den måndag, 23 juni 2014 13:32 skrev Hannah Ogwapiti <hannahogwapiti@googlemail.com>:


Mulindwa,
I applaud Obama's policy of indifference in the Middle East. Whatever way you look at it, the situation is bogus.

Syria: Alawite minorities are more liberal. They allow and protect other religious minorities. 'In sensu-stricto', they are less fundamentalist than the alternative brand of primitive 'wahabist' Islam fronted by the pseudo-Sunni rebels. This is the brand in which Al-Quaeda operates. Although Syria has been at odds with the West, its threat level had never unfurled to the nuisance level that these marauding rebels can raise

Iraq: GHW Bush Senior and later his dimwitted son Bush drove out the 'moderate Sunni regime' from Iraq and replaced them with a forced weak Shiite leadership that depended on the US for survival. Before pulling out, OBM made sure to spend billion of dollars training the Iraq Army to manage power. It is non-sustainable. The army is dead weak. The Sunni's are fighting back (clothed in the barbaric ISIS brand).

Demographically, Shiites are more in number in Iraq but not so far from the Sunnis. Now, the Kurds who are non-Arab have allied with the Sunnis who were their arch enemies in the past. Some Shiites also know that Maliki is a weakling.

Iran and Saudi: Iran, the Holy Grail of Shiite Islam warns that no one should touch the status quo and is ready to work with the US on this. Kerry says they can work together. On the other hand, Saudi-Arabia, the Holy Grail of Sunni Islam (yet a stronger ally of the US than Iran) says no one should touch the marauding fighters who have taken large swathes of the North and are matching towards Baghdad. However, several Shiite politicians admit that the current government of Maliki is very very weak.

Given all this nonsense, why should the US, and indeed any western power intervene - let them leave the situation to roll on until there is a strong political base or until the country splinters. Fighting for any side in Iraq and indeed in Syria is not a worthy war - in fact Syria was a mistake because the minority Alawites are more measured than the fundamentalist Wahabbists who are hiding under the Sunni majority.I used to think Assad was mad till I had a closer look at what the opposing jihadists were doing now I firmly believe he's a a far better option. Let the guns toll until a political revolution unfolds.

Imperialism caused all this! Everywhere there has been "Western intervention" direct or indirect from 2001 on there has never been peace; Iraq, Libya, Egypt, now wait for Afghanistan, etc. I do not refute the fact that fighting terrorism makes our world better, but how do we do it? Well fight but with wisdom! Not that I liked Saddam and Qaddafi but these nations (Iraq and Libya) will take a generation to get them to where they were in the times of Saddam and Qaddafi. I like what Mahmood Abas did; inasmuchas Hezbolah were labelled a terrorist group, he invited them to forge Palestine's future together especially that they had won majority seats in parliament.

Generally, the whole thing is about politics at the global level - How do you send an entire sub-continent back to 1900 so you can continue feasting on their natural resources. Its not about not knowing what to do. If a region is set to 'auto-destruction mode', it makes political sense to leave them to finish themselves as long as the oil pipelines are safe. Who told u the Americans love the Libyans, Syrians, Iraqis and Egyptians so much? They don't even love Ugandans if you critically think about it. They just use Museveni and love our oil!

H.O






On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Herrn Edward Mulindwa <mulindwa@look.ca> wrote:
 
 
 
 
EM
On the 49th Parallel          
 
            Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni and Dr. Kiiza Besigye Uganda is in anarchy"
           
Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni na Dk. Kiiza Besigye Uganda ni katika machafuko"
 
--
UAH forum is devoted to matters of interest to Ugandans. Individuals are responsible for whatever they post on this forum.To unsubscribe from this group, send email to: ugandans-at-heart+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com or Abbey Semuwemba at: abbeysemuwemba@gmail.com.



--
H.OGWAPITI
-----------------------------------------------------
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that  we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic  and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."
---Theodore Roosevelt
--
UAH forum is devoted to matters of interest to Ugandans. Individuals are responsible for whatever they post on this forum.To unsubscribe from this group, send email to: ugandans-at-heart+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com or Abbey Semuwemba at: abbeysemuwemba@gmail.com.


Sharing is Caring:


WE LOVE COMMENTS


0 comments:

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

Followers