{UAH} WHAT IS SO OBSCURELY CONTROVERSIAL?!?!?!?

Yeah, what is so obscurely controversial about

the dismissal / release /relieve (feel free 'n choose your version)

from the office of the Prime Minister of Uganda?!?!?!

I am yet understand it. From the way subsequent development

percolated( with governance resorted to advance and complex

hide and seek science and art),it appeared obvious that

co-operation and cordinationsbetween the Office of 

the President and that of the Prime Minister had dropped

to untenable level.

In that regard, I do not see any controversy in the 

Prime Minister being discharged. It is ordinary and normal.

Both you and I would look for alternatives if / when

in the same situation.

Well, I know Ugandan are notorious when it comes to disregarding

routines and procedures.It is everywhere. In courts; in Land

and property registration office(where I am currently contesting

against advanced fraud & theft by some Educator from Canada

who had fraudulently acquired title of our family property);

It is in disregard of constitutions..mm, etc, osv.

So, what is so controversial with President Museveni discharging

Prime Minister Amama Mbabazi?

From the way things were reaching a dead end, would it

have been better if President Museveni did not act accordingly?!?

I don't think so. There was too much hide and seek for governance.

What is important in my view is that the discharge is in good faith

and they both see the necessity in good faith and continue

in the same good faith.

Noc'la gaumoy.

 

"WE FORM THE CULTURE THAT FORMS US"….noc'la gaumoy.