UAH is secular, intellectual and non-aligned politically, culturally or religiously email discussion group.


Re: {UAH} The book that claims Jesus had a wife and kids — and the embattled author behind it - The Washington Post

lucky thing no Christian will pull out the dagger for this
------------------------------

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 4:28 PM EST 'edward pojim' via Ugandans at Heart (UAH) Community wrote:



>Ocen;

>

>As with anything about JC, this book will garner readership and criticism in equal measure.

>

>Jesus is the one guy who has the knack to divide the world every time his name is mentioned. I don't know if this book changes anything about the person of Jesus Christ, for he's remembered not because of his chastity, but because of his message - that he died for our sins and we are now all eligible to join him in Heaven if we only accept him as our personal saviour.

>

>Sounds like a pretty easy deal to me, but is it? The struggle continues.

>

>Pojim

>

>

>

>--------------------------------------------

>On Mon, 11/10/14, ocennekyon@gmail.com <ocennekyon@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> Subject: {UAH} The book that claims Jesus had a wife and kids — and the embattled author behind it - The Washington Post

> To: "Ugandans Heart" <ugandans-at-heart@googlegroups.com>

> Date: Monday, November 10, 2014, 12:58 PM

>

> http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/11/10/the-book-that-claims-jesus-had-a-wife-and-kids-and-the-controversial-author-behind-it/?tid=HP_more?tid=HP_more

>

>

>

> The book that claims Jesus had a wife and kids —

> and the embattled author behind it

> Reproduction of print

> showing Christ and Mary Magdalene. (Library of Congress

> Prints and Photographs Division)The authors

> want to talk about Christ. They want you to know that,

> buried beneath centuries of misinformation and

> conspiracy, Jesus had a secret wife, named Mary Magdalene,

> and he fathered two children with her. And they want you to

> know that their book on the matter, named the

> "Lost Gospel," is on sale soon for

> $21.74. "If true," reported the Daily Mail in an overheated

> dispatch, "this would make it the greatest revelation into

> the life of Jesus in nearly 2,000 years."Indeed. If

> true. But is this just the latest theory of

> an embattled theologian?Rekindling one of the

> Jesus Christs's greatest mysteries, a la "The Da Vinci

> Code," the new book draws from a

> 1,500-year-old Aramaic-language manuscript found inside

> the British Library. There, the authors say, the secrets of

> Jesus's family life have been in plain sight for more

> than a century."What the Vatican feared — and

> what ["Da Vinci Code" author] Dan Brown only

> suspected — has come true," begins the book, authored by York

> University (Canada) professor Barrie Wilson

> and documentarian Simcha Jacobovici."There is

> now written evidence that Jesus was married to Mary the

> Magdalene and that they had children together. … Gathering

> dust in the British Library is a document that takes us into

> the missing years of Jesus's life. … According to the

> document that we uncovered, sometime during this period he

> became engaged, got married, had sexual relations, and

> produced children. Before anyone gets his/her theological

> back up, keep in mind that we are not attacking anyone's

> theology. We are reporting on text."The text in

> question is called the Ecclesiastical History of Zacharias

> Rhetor, written on treated animal skin, which was brought to

> the United Kingdom in 1847 when the British Museum bought it

> from an Egyptian monastery. Scholars scrutinized the

> document and discarded it as insignificant.Then,

> years ago, Wilson and Jacobovici gave it a look, and began

> to suspect otherwise. The Sunday Times quoted Wilson describing it as an

> "ancient Syriac manuscript lurking in the British Museum

> … Scholars have known about it for almost 200 years, but

> have not known what to make of it."But these

> authors, who are expected to answer questions on Wednesday

> at the British Library, did. They claim the meaning of the

> text had been enshrouded in code and "embedded meaning." It speaks of a figure named

> Joseph, who apparently bore striking similarities

> to Jesus. He was depicted as "savior-figure," the

> book said. "Joseph, like Jesus, was assumed dead and

> turned up alive; he too had humble beginnings and ended up a

> king of sorts." So they contend Joseph was really

> Jesus in the text.And this Joseph, they said, had a

> wife named Aseneth, who they purport represented Mary

> Magdalene. "Put simply, in order to convey the stature of

> Aseneth — perhaps Mary the Magdalene — to his audience,

> the unknown author of our manuscript selected a dominant

> image … he could be sure his readers would readily

> understand."The book's purported findings,

> however, only tell part of the story. Jacobovici, widely

> known in the theological community, has already come

> under criticism for pursuing theories of early

> Christianity that many scholars have dismissed. The

> controversy is a subplot to the grander drama

> surrounding the study of Jesus's life, illustrating the

> tug-and-pull between popular interest, entrenched doctrine,

> the potential for big payouts and the limits of academic

> inquiry.In 2002, Jacobovici, a Canadian filmmaker who

> studies biblical archaeology, pushed

> out a documentary that hailed a seemingly pivotal

> relic called the James ossuary, which allegedly showed

> Jesus had a family. Later named one of the top 10 scientific hoaxes of

> all time by Discovery Channel, its owner was indicted on

> charges of forgery, and archaeologists from Israel to the

> United States denounced the ossuary as a hoax.

> "It's a publicity stunt, and it will make these guys

> very rich," University of Arizona archaeologist William G.

> Dever told The Washington Post in 2007. "And it

> will upset millions of innocent people because they don't

> know enough to separate fact from

> fiction."Jacobovici went on to author other works

> called out for veering into untruth. One imbroglio spilled

> over into the courts, with Jacobovici suing a critic

> for libel. Jacobovici fumed in aninterview with Time: He "crossed the line

> from fair comment to outright libel. Specifically, he has

> accused me repeatedly — verbally and in writing — of

> 'forging archaeology.'"Then a group of

> academics from Duke University to Columbia University to Tel

> Aviv Universitywrote a joint letter in 2008 that cast

> suspicion on his work involving the Talpiot tomb, which

> Jacobovici claimed showed Jesus had a family. The

> letter, signed by 17 academics, called Jacobovici's

> work "controversial" and disputed his assessment that

> one archaeologist's widow had "vindicated" his claims about the

> relics."We wish to protest the misrepresentation of

> the conference proceedings in the media," the lettersaid. "And make it clear that the majority of

> scholars … either reject the identification of the Talpiot

> tomb as belonging to Jesus's family or find this claim

> highly speculative."So what about this most

> recent one?"It sounds like the deepest bilge,"


--
UAH forum is devoted to matters of interest to Ugandans. Individuals are responsible for whatever they post on this forum.To unsubscribe from this group, send email to: ugandans-at-heart+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com or Abbey Semuwemba at: abbeysemuwemba@gmail.com.

Sharing is Caring:


WE LOVE COMMENTS


0 comments:

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

Followers