{UAH} US judge deems AIG bailout illegal but awards no damages
US judge deems AIG bailout illegal but awards no damages
A federal judge in Washington has ruled the US government had no authority to both prop upINSURANCE giant AIG and claim an 80 percent stake in the company during the height of the financial crisis.
The ruling was a partial victory for former AIG Chief Executive Maurice Greenberg, who had sued the government over its dramatic rescue of the failing company in September 2008 on the same weekend thatINVESTMENT BANK Lehman Brothers went bust.
But Wheeler did notGRANT Greenberg nor any other shareholders compensation, saying that Greenberg's company Starr International - a major holder of AIG stock at the time of the bailout - would have ended up with nothing had the US Federal Reserve's New York branch not stepped in and lent AIG money.
"While the taking of 79.9 percent equity ownership and the running of AIG's business were not permitted under the Federal Reserve Act, the government did not cause any economic loss to AIG's shareholders," Wheeler wrote in his decision.
"In the end, the Achilles' heel of Starr's case is that, if not for the government intervention, AIG would haveFILED FOR BANKRUPTCY," he added.
The verdict, although it did not entirely absolve federal regulators, allowed them some freedom to forge similar plans in future crises.
AIG was teetering on the brink of bankruptcy when the government intervened in 2008 with an initialLOAN of $85 billion (75.3 billion euros today). The insurance giant's books were overburdened with massive losses it had acquired after selling dubious insurance plans during the subprime mortgage boom.
Those initial rescueFUNDS were conditional on repayment with 14 percent interest and an 80 percent public stake in the company. The amount ultimately rose to $182.3 billion and AIG has since repaid theLOANS
in full, leaving US taxpayers with nearly $23 billion in profit.
Shares in AIG jumped $1.24, or about 2 percent, to $63.13 after the ruling became public. There were fears that shares would have fallen had the judge ruled in favor of Greenberg's claim for $40 billion in damages.
cjc/uhe (Reuters, AFP)
Disclaimer:Everyone posting to this Forum bears the sole responsibility for any legal consequences of his or her postings, and hence statements and facts must be presented responsibly. Your continued membership signifies that you agree to this disclaimer and pledge to abide by our Rules and Guidelines.To unsubscribe from this group, send email to: ugandans-at-heart+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com or Abbey Semuwemba at: abbeysemuwemba@gmail.com.
0 comments:
Post a Comment