SV: {UAH} Bunyoro_Kitara Land Case: After listening to lawyers on both sides for nearly five hours the Uganda Constitutional Court, presided over by Acting Deputy Chief Justice Steven Kavuma said they will give their ruling on notice.
Mzee Miriima,
First, I do not know the trades mark of cases that had been won by your
Lawyer ODONG Ayena in Uganda or outside? This means, I do not trust
the capacity of this man ODONG Ayena.
Second, has he been an equivalence to the likes of the late OBOL Ochola,
and OMARA Atubu Advocates, I could have thought ODONG Ayena could
be of value to your case!
Lastly, your case is an international court which I think requires a law
firm of international creed. I think ODONG Ayena is of low standard
for representing you!
Ocaya pOcure
Den torsdag, 16 juli 2015 3:06 skrev yowaana nyamutale <ynyamutale@gmail.com>:
George
It appears u have not been following the case very well.On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:17 AM, George Okello <opallog@gmail.com> wrote:
Secretary Henry Ford Mirima,
Did the case take only a day? I wnated to apply to appear as amicus
curiae (friend of court) in the case, but it would have taken me two
days at the minimum to address all of the legal issues involved in the
case. This is a very epochal case, and I hope the lawyers gave it the
rigour and intellectual attention it deserves.
George Okello
On 7/15/15, yowaana nyamutale <ynyamutale@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Constitutional Court's five Justices, Steven Kavuma, Richard Buteera,
> Lilian Tibalemwa, Mwangustya, Lubi Aweri Opio,who were all present had
> listened to arguements from lawyers representing the petitioners,the people
> of Bunyoro-Kitara, Ayena Odongo, and the Uganda Attorney General Henry
> Oloka, and Buganda Kingdom lawyers Mpanga, Apolo Makubuya and Luswata.
>
> The Constitutional Court is sitting as a result of having been asked by the
> Uganda High Court to interpret dozens of issues of a Constitutional Nature
> which were raised by the petitioners lawyer Ayena Odongo during the
> Scheduling Conference.
>
> These issues were raised by Banyoro's lawyer Ayena Odongo..Chief among them
> is to determine whether the 1900 Buganda Agreement is null and void.
>
> Dozens of issues revolve around the validity of the 1900 Buganda
> Agreement.
>
> For example Ayena Odongo says the British had no right, to donate the seven
> Lost Counties, Buyaga, Bugangaizi, Buheekura, Buruuli, Bunyala, Rugonjo,
> and Bulemeezi to Buganda when those counties did not belong to Britain. He
> maintains that if Britain wanted to reward Buganda for assisting Britain to
> defeat Kabaleega, they should have donated land in the United Kingdom, like
> Wales or Scotland.
>
> Ayena further argues that the Mailo Land system, created during the making
> of the 1900 Buganda agreement, and imposed on the Lost Counties should not
> have been so since the Banyoro apart from not having participated in the
> making of the 1900 Buganda Agreement, the Banyoro had their cultural land
> system which was ownership of land through a communal system.
>
> Ayena Odongo further argued that the Uganda government by importing
> Abafuruki and settling them on Banyoro land in the Lost counties, and
> donating twelve miles to every Mufuruki family, and donate 12,000,000/= per
> Mufuruki family, without doing the same to Banyoro, is grossly
> unconstitutional, since the Uganda Constitution says, there must be
> affirmative action to correct the historical injustices committed against
> Banyoro.
>
> These, and other dozens of issue of a constitutional nature hinging on the
> validity of the 1900 Buganda Agreement are what the Uganda High Court felt
> a need to have the Uganda Constitutional Court make an interpretation.
>
> Leading the Buganda side Lawyer Apolo Makubuya said the issues the
> petitioners were raising are based on expired Buganda Agreements of 1894,
> 1900, 1954 and the Third Amendment of the Uganda Constitution which
> transferred the two lost counties of Buyaga and Bugangaizi.
>
> To that Ayena Odongo for Banyoro retorted that since the current Uganda
> Constitution, and all the laws which are today applicable in Uganda laws
> are based on these agreements, more especially the 1900 Buganda Agreement,
> there is no way these issues could be detached from the present Uganda
> Constitution.
>
> Apolo Makubuya further said the point of reference which the petitioners
> are raising today have never been raised in any court where they could have
> been referred to this court.
>
> To this Ayena Odongo said, indeed, these issues were raised in the
> Scheduling Conference where the presiding Judge asked him, Odongo, to make
> proposals for interpretation, which he made, and submitted to court, and
> made available to the defendants. Hence, the High Court owned the proposals
> and sent them to this Constitutional Court for interpretation.
>
> Henry Oloka for Uganda Attorney General concluded by reminding the
> Constitutional Court that this is a very important case which is raising
> very fundamental issues which must be handled very carefully. He said Court
> must be aware that today Uganda is not in the position of settling issues
> as it was when they were making the 1894 and 1900 agreements which had the
> use of physical force in the background. He said he does not want to see a
> situation whereby Ugandans are called upon to resort to use of guns and
> spears.
>
> To this Ayena Odongo replied that the Banyoro of today are not the Banyoro
> of 1894 where the language they understood was that of guns or spears. He
> submitted that if Banyoro today wanted to settle Constitutional issues by
> the use of guns and spears they should not have come to court to argue
> their case using their heads.
>
> He emphasised that the petitioners are law abiding Ugandans who believe in
> the rule of law and order, therefore, they should not be thought to be
> ready to settle Constitutional affairs by he use of spears and guns.
>
> Justice Steven Kavuma who presided over the session told the lawyers that
> the court had listened very carefully to their arguments and they are going
> to give their judgement on notice.
>
> Henry Ford Mirima
>
> Press Secretary of the Omukama of Bunyoro-Kitara, Rukirabasaija, Agutamba,
> Solomon Gafabusa Iguru
>
> --
> Disclaimer:Everyone posting to this Forum bears the sole responsibility for
> any legal consequences of his or her postings, and hence statements and
> facts must be presented responsibly. Your continued membership signifies
> that you agree to this disclaimer and pledge to abide by our Rules and
> Guidelines.To unsubscribe from this group, send email to:
> ugandans-at-heart+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com or Abbey Semuwemba at:
> abbeysemuwemba@gmail.com.
>
--
Disclaimer:Everyone posting to this Forum bears the sole responsibility for any legal consequences of his or her postings, and hence statements and facts must be presented responsibly. Your continued membership signifies that you agree to this disclaimer and pledge to abide by our Rules and Guidelines.To unsubscribe from this group, send email to: ugandans-at-heart+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com or Abbey Semuwemba at: abbeysemuwemba@gmail.com.
Disclaimer:Everyone posting to this Forum bears the sole responsibility for any legal consequences of his or her postings, and hence statements and facts must be presented responsibly. Your continued membership signifies that you agree to this disclaimer and pledge to abide by our Rules and Guidelines.To unsubscribe from this group, send email to: ugandans-at-heart+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com or Abbey Semuwemba at: abbeysemuwemba@gmail.com.
0 comments:
Post a Comment