{UAH} MUSOKE: wrong to quote Tinyefuza?
|
1:42 PM |
No comments |
Mw Musoke,
that article is not a criminal investigation as you you seem to suggest. Rather, it is an opinion piece by Dr Epstein about Uganda.
Even if it had been a criminal investigation by the government, the sources she quotes (parliamentary records, interviews of people like Tinyefuza and doctors, newspaper articles, etc) are sufficient. That is the kind of evidence presented in ordinary matters. e.g you can quote a news article, not to prove that what is reported is correct but to prove that that matter was written about. If you think that she is wrong, you should present contrary evidence.
Personally, I don't know if she right or wrong...or if her sources were lying or not...though Tinyefuza seems to embellish his stories whenever I read about him.
thanks
For a faster response please contact me at 415.789.6427
sent from SONY Z3 on Vodafone's LTE Network!---In UNAANET@yahoogroups.com, <sammusoke@...> wrote :
Ben and Abu, this is basically a criminal investigation report. You can't base a criminal investigation on what was said by some parliamentarians on a video, or tabloid newspapers or a disgruntled/ double disinformation agent like Ssejusa and come up with a credible unbiased conclusion.
Sun Oct 4, 2015 10:07 am (PDT) . Posted by Ben Ziraba Nyende
All the research in the library of Parliament, and the videos of the speeches made are innuendos to you?
Sent from my iPhone
Sent from my iPhone
0 comments:
Post a Comment