{UAH} Edward Mulindwa, This is how things will end...... Trump tells intel chiefs to 'go back to school' after they break with him
|
10:14 PM |
No comments |
Moses Nekyon
That is a very interesting argument that we cannot ignore. Intelligence Chiefs collect Data and supply it to the Commander in chief. The commander in Chief makes policy. For think this through, when a candidate campaigns does he need to go to the commanders and get a written statement? No I can stand in front of Americans that promise that American soldiers have been in Afghanistan for 18 years, thousands have lost their lives, we have lost so many billions of dollars in there and we have no firkin hope of winning the war. I am pulling them out as soon as I am sworn to power. CIA Director, DNI let alone FBI director has absolutely no contribution he makes into that promise. The commander in chief has seen that that ISIS has been beaten to a level he wants it to be beaten, and your instructions today is to pull out the firkin soldiers. You do not ask the questions you implement. When we do it eh way you lefties are preaching today, Donald had to sit with The Obama Commanders with the Bush commanders to decide what policy he must implement. I will agree with that policy if you take out election completely, for elections means changing policy and to a new better policy that waiting on the idiotic commanders that sit in the offices to instruct the executive. For think this through, now they have made their case to the senate to give them the money, what if the president vetoes it then what?
Good Lord it was one man that murdered all soldiers that have died in Iraq, it was Collin Powel that told the world that there are weapons of mass destructions when they were never there, people like Collin Power belongs to jail. And now you want us to listen to another intelligence officer? They have interests, the more they are out there the more money they make, and the president is very slow, what he needs to do today is to go to Congress and ask for the power to go to war. Or get out of all war zones. Hey we are going into 2020 election if a Democrat wins then the current chiefs will dictate the terms of that administration too? God forbid !!!!! If anything goes wrong in a war zone I have never seen anyone blaming the intelligence chiefs, they always blame the administration, so why do you blame the administration when the decisions were made by intelligence chiefs? Sounds like blowing and sucking the same time. Now you know why president Obama fired them by the thousands.
They all need to go back to school indeed !!!!!!
EM -> { Trump for 2020 }
On the 49th Parallel
Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja and Dr. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda is in anarchy"
Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja na Dk. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda ni katika machafuko"
From: ugandans-at-heart@googlegroups.com [mailto:ugandans-at-heart@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Moses Nekyon
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 10:12 AM
To: Ugandans At Heart <ugandans-at-heart@googlegroups.com>
Subject: {UAH} Edward Mulindwa, This is how things will end...... Trump tells intel chiefs to 'go back to school' after they break with him
Trump tells intel chiefs to 'go back to school' after they break with him
The president reopened his feud with the intelligence community in a series of heated tweets.
Updated 01/30/2019 09:55 AM EST
President Donald Trump lit into the U.S. intelligence community on Wednesday, telling his intel chiefs to "go back to school" just one day after they publicly contradicted him on several of his foreign policy priorities.
"The Intelligence people seem to be extremely passive and naive when it comes to the dangers of Iran," Trump wrote on Twitter. "They are wrong! When I became President Iran was making trouble all over the Middle East, and beyond. Since ending the terrible Iran Nuclear Deal, they are MUCH different, but a source of potential danger and conflict."
He continued, "They are testing Rockets (last week) and more, and are coming very close to the edge. There economy is now crashing, which is the only thing holding them back. Be careful of Iran. Perhaps Intelligence should go back to school!"
Trump's tweets were a direct rebuttal of the public testimony his top intelligence chiefs gave Tuesday morning while discussing the gravest threats to the U.S. worldwide. The attack also marked the latest example of Trump's public feud with the intelligence community. The president has often cast doubt on the official assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to aid his candidacy, and even publicly sided with Russian President Vladimir Putin on the matter.
Morning Defense newsletter
Sign up for Morning Defense, a daily briefing on Washington's national security apparatus.
Sign Up
By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and CIA Director Gina Haspel both indicated on Tuesday that there is significant daylight between the president and the intelligence community on major issues. They testified that the Islamic State remains a forceful presence in Iraq and Syria, that North Korea is not likely to give up its nuclear weapons, and that Iran is not yet seeking a nuclear weapon.
They also warned about foreign interference in U.S. elections, and declined to classify the migrant crisis on the southern border a security crisis as Trump has previously claimed.
On Wednesday, Trump insisted that his administration had made significant progress toward wrapping up the U.S. military's longstanding engagements in the Middle East, contrasting the gains of his administration with those made under former presidents.
He wrote that "tremendous progress" had been made in the fight against Islamic State militants since he assumed office two years ago, "especially over [the] last 5 weeks," when he abruptly announced they had already been defeated and that he would pull U.S. forces out of Syria.
The Islamic State's self-declared "Caliphate will soon be destroyed, unthinkable two years ago," he claimed.
That position puts the president at odds with what Coats told lawmakers Tuesday, when he predicted that the Islamic State "very likely will continue to pursue external attacks from Iraq and Syria against regional and Western adversaries, including the United States" and noted that the militant group "is intent on resurging and still commands thousands of fighters in Iraq and Syria."
Coats and Haspel also presented a different outlook on Iran, saying Tuesday that Tehran isn't "currently" taking steps to develop nuclear weapons and that "technically" they remain in compliance with the Iran nuclear deal. However, Coats also noted that Iran has "publicly threatened to push the boundaries" of the deal if there were no calculable benefits from it.
On North Korea, Trump also tried to rebut his intel chiefs, saying on Wednesday that the historically isolated country's relationship with the U.S. is the "best it has ever been."
Though he has previously declared that he would push the volatile regime of Kim Jong Un to totally wind down its nuclear weapons programs, on Wednesday Trump said there was a "decent chance" of that.
Play Video
true
While Coats on Tuesday told lawmakers that Kim's regime has "halted some provocative behavior" related to its nuclear program and that Kim "continues to demonstrate openness" to denuclearizing the peninsula, the director of national intelligence also noted assessments show that some of North Korea's activity is "inconsistent with full denuclearization."
"Time will tell what will happen with North Korea, but at the end of the previous administration, relationship was horrendous and very bad things were about to happen. Now a whole different story," Trump said Wednesday.
"I look forward to seeing Kim Jong Un shortly," he added, referring to his second summit with Kim at the end of next month. "Progress being made-big difference!"
The president also said that peace negotiations with the Taliban "are proceeding well in Afghanistan after 18 years of fighting," adding "fighting continues but the people of Afghanistan want peace in this never ending war. We will soon see if talks will be successful?"
While the U.S. peace envoy to Afghanistan said over the weekend that negotiators had "made significant progress on vital issues," one former U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan on Wednesday slammed the administration's agreement to exclude the Afghan government from peace talks with the Taliban, calling the emergence of such a framework for peace equivalent to surrender.
Ryan Crocker, a career diplomat who served as ambassador to Afghanistan during the Obama administration, wrote in an op-ed in The Washington Post that negotiating with the Taliban while agreeing to their demands to leave the Afghan government out of negotiation will enable the terrorist group to flourish again once U.S. forces are withdrawn.
"The Taliban will offer any number of commitments, knowing that when we are gone and the Taliban is back, we will have no means of enforcing any of them," he wrote.
Moses Ocen Nekyon
Democracy is two Wolves and a Lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed Lamb disputing the results.
--
Disclaimer:Everyone posting to this Forum bears the sole responsibility for any legal consequences of his or her postings, and hence statements and facts must be presented responsibly. Your continued membership signifies that you agree to this disclaimer and pledge to abide by our Rules and Guidelines.To unsubscribe from this group, send email to: ugandans-at-heart+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment