{UAH} YOU READ THIS DECISION AND WONDER IF LETITIA JAMES IS PAYING ATTENTION

Friends

 

You see there are people that just decide to take a fall for the rest of the team, my heart goes out for this poor woman, for she decided to single handedly take down Trump. Georgia became Georgia. She frustrated the entire country, critical thinkers like myself, stopped everything we were doing, to monitor what was happening in Georgia. And because of the nonsense of this one woman, the election of Joe Biden remain into question for Georgia is still in question to this very day. But hey you  would not raise those questions for this idiot would never shut up. And I guess the sun has just gone down on her. I have warned Liz Cheney she has to be very careful, and chose her words very careful for she can easily end up in jail, today I am adding a second name, Fani Willis has to start to choose her words very careful, for at this point she too can end up in jail.

 

I am ending this writing this way, if by today through all this, Letitia Ann James  the AG of New York is not yet concerned, then she is not paying enough attention. Her time is up.

===============================

Court rules Georgia lawmakers can subpoena Fani Willis for information related to her Trump case

Story by KATE BRUMBACK and JEFF AMY

Georgia Election Indictment Lawmakers© Brynn Anderson

ATLANTA (AP) — A judge has ruled that the Georgia state Senate can subpoena Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis as part of a inquiry into whether she has engaged in misconduct during her prosecution of President-elect Donald Trump but is giving Willis the chance to contest whether lawmakers' demands are overly broad.

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Shukura Ingram filed the order Monday, telling Willis she has until Jan. 13 to submit arguments over whether the subpoenas seek legally shielded or confidential information. Ingram wrote that the would issue a final order later saying what Willis had to respond to.

Willis, though, wants the ruling overturned.

“We believe the ruling is wrong and will appeal,” former Georgia Gov. Roy Barnes, who is representing Willis in the case, wrote in an email to The Associated Press.

A state appeals court earlier this month removed Willis from the Georgia election interference case against Donald Trump and others, citing an “appearance of impropriety” that might not typically warrant such a removal. The Georgia Court of Appeals panel said in a 2-1 ruling that because of the romantic relationship Willis had with special prosecutor Nathan Wade “this is the rare case in which disqualification is mandated and no other remedy will suffice to restore public confidence in the integrity of these proceedings.”

Willis’ office immediately filed a notice of intent to ask the Georgia Supreme Court to review the decision.

The Republican-led Senate committee sent subpoenas to Willis in August seeking to compel her to testify during its September meeting and to produce scores of documents. The committee was formed earlier this year to examine allegations of “various forms of misconduct” by Willis, an elected Democrat, during her prosecution of Trump and others over their efforts to overturn the former president’s 2020 election loss in Georgia.

The resolution creating the committee focused in particular on Willis’ hiring of Wade to lead the prosecution against Trump and others. The resolution said the relationship amounted to a “clear conflict of interest and a fraud upon the taxpayers” of the county and state.

Barnes, Willis’ attorney, argued that the Senate committee did not have the power to subpoena her. He also argued that the subpoenas were overly broad and not related to a legitimate legislative need, saying the committee is seeking confidential and privileged information, as well as private and personal information.

Willis’ challenge was pending in mid-September when she skipped a hearing during which the committee members had hoped to question her.

In October, the committee asked Ingram to require Willis to comply with the subpoenas. The committee’s lawyers wrote in a court filing that Willis’ failure to do so had delayed its ability to finish its inquiry and to provide recommendations for any legislation or changes in appropriations that might result.